- From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 20:33:54 -0800 (PST)
- To: mike@belshe.com, fenix@google.com, martin.thomson@gmail.com, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, pmcmanus@mozilla.com, mnot@mnot.net
- Cc: martin.thomson@gmail.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7540, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 2 (HTTP/2)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7540&eid=4871 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Section: 5.3.4 Original Text ------------- For example, assume streams A and B share a parent, and streams C and D both depend on stream A. Prior to the removal of stream A, if streams A and D are unable to proceed, then stream C receives all the resources dedicated to stream A. If stream A is removed from the tree, the weight of stream A is divided between streams C and D. If stream D is still unable to proceed, this results in stream C receiving a reduced proportion of resources. For equal starting weights, C receives one third, rather than one half, of available resources. Corrected Text -------------- For example, assume streams A and B share a parent, and streams C and D both depend on stream A. When A is complete, streams C and D receive all the resources that would be allocated to stream A. If stream D is unable to proceed, stream C shares resources with stream B. Assuming equal starting weights on all streams, this means that streams B and C receive an equal share. However, if stream A is removed from the tree, the weight of stream A is divided between streams C and D. With stream A removed and stream D unable to proceed, stream C receives a reduced proportion of resources. For equal starting weights, C receives one third, rather than one half, of available resources. Notes ----- The example was incorrect. Dependent streams do not receive resources if their parent is blocked; they only receive resources once the parent is complete. Note that I didn't correct the common misunderstanding regarding the third here. That might be further improved by doing the math. That is: Before removal: A=N (C=N, D=N), B=N; After removal: B=N, C=N/2, D=N/2; Therefore viable streams are B=N and C=N/2 meaning a total pool of 3N/2. The resource proportion allocated to C is therefore (N/2)/(3N/2)=1/3. But that would probably need an entire section for the example, rather than a single paragraph. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7540 (draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-17) -------------------------------------- Title : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 2 (HTTP/2) Publication Date : May 2015 Author(s) : M. Belshe, R. Peon, M. Thomson, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis APP Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2016 04:34:29 UTC