Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)

> On 30 Nov 2016, at 11:32, Benedikt Christoph Wolters <> wrote:
> 2016-11-30 9:41 GMT+01:00 Cory Benfield <>:
>> What happens if both stream A and B are blocked? Should my server endeavour to serve dependent streams in that case? I *think* the answer is yes because of the logic around having grouping nodes formed from idle streams, but I’m not 100% sure and would like clarification.
> Section 5.3.4 Prioritization State Management states:
>> Resources are shared between streams with the same parent stream, which means that if a stream in that set closes or becomes blocked, any spare capacity allocated to a stream is distributed to the immediate neighbors of the stream.
> In my understanding in your example A and B are blocked, C and D are
> immediate neighbors of A so according to this they would get the
> resources of A.

No, they aren’t immediate neighbours, they are immediate *children*. This is exactly the core question.

Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2016 12:43:14 UTC