- From: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:38:28 +0000
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Matt Menke <mmenke@google.com>
- CC: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Sadly, yes. -----Original Message----- From: Poul-Henning Kamp [mailto:phk@phk.freebsd.dk] Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 2:15 PM To: Matt Menke <mmenke@google.com> Cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> Subject: Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next -------- In message <CAEK7mvp5zDw7uo6ZP3KOhQiWWDuoEBAay5wPWYRgpoCNgnsidw@mail.gmail.com> , Matt Menke writes: >No, that would be treated as an HTTP/0.9 response. Wow... that's a lot more tolerant than I would have expected. Do you really still see HTTP/0.9 reponses in the wild ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 17 October 2016 21:39:01 UTC