Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications

On 21 November 2016 at 13:38, Mark Nottingham <> wrote:
> The feeling in the room was that we should abandon the JFV draft and adopt the structure draft in its place, with the understanding that it better reflected our current thinking in this area.

This seems like a good plan.  PHK's work is closer to what we do today
and therefore less disruptive.

We discussed some of the more ambitious features of the common
structure document, such as integer dates and the angle bracket; is
the intent to pursue these separately?

Received on Monday, 21 November 2016 03:17:32 UTC