Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt

On 2016-10-11 10:24, Mike West wrote:
> Mark filed, and I
> fixed it
> in
> I'm sure we'll find more formatting issues over the next week or so that
> arose from the port from the flat text file to Markdown, so I'll hold
> off on publishing a -01 draft until those shake out.
> Thanks!
> -mike

FWIW, I believe this change:


   token = <token, defined in [RFC2616], Section 2.2>


   token = token
             ; defined in [RFC2616], Section 2.2

is a bad idea; it makes the ABNF invalid.

(similar changes have been made to other imports)

Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2016 09:40:56 UTC