- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:33:47 +0100
- To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2016-11-12 01:00, Alex Rousskov wrote: > On 11/11/2016 12:49 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: >> Q: maybe we should create a Wiki page, summarizing implementation status >> and bug reports? > > FWIW, based on the results I had access to, most of the HTTP proxies > using our HTTP compliance test suite mishandled 1xx messages one way or > the other. Even today, after all the tests and bug fixes, there is an > outstanding Squid bug where an unfortunate timing of 1xx and other > events lead to a crash. 1xx is evidently tricky to get right. > > This data point is not meant to support or combat the "let the bad > implementations surface/suffer" argument. I am just reporting that many, > possibly most proxies mishandle 1xx messages. Thanks for the feedback. When you talk about "timing", does that apply to any 1xx, or just the 100-continue dance? Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 12 November 2016 07:34:24 UTC