- From: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 22:22:05 +0000
- To: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
- CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Shouldn't matter, for us. I'll defer to others. -----Original Message----- From: Cory Benfield [mailto:cory@lukasa.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2016 3:08 PM To: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>; Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>; HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt > On 1 Nov 2016, at 17:24, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote: > > FWIW, our implementation should already ignore this response and process the final status code correctly. If you have a public endpoint that returns a hint, we can all do a quick field test. Were you interested in a HTTP/1.1 or HTTP/2 endpoint? I can put one up that unconditionally returns a 103, though it may just be easier to spin up H2O or nghttp2. Cory
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2016 22:22:41 UTC