- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 23:01:05 +0100
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
- Cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2016-10-15 10:29, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > -------- > In message <201610150820.u9F8KlU6025186@shell.siilo.fmi.fi>, Kari Hurtta writes > : > >> Headers which may use rfc5987bis are then "uncommon structure". > > I think rfc5987 is a bad idea, and it is one of my motivations for > pushing for Common Structure. > >> "Content-Disposition" and "Link" are not mentioned >> on draft-kamp-httpbis-structure. > > No, I only surveyed RFC723x. > ... Content-Disposition already fits. Link could be integrated by allowing the coded-URL production as identifier. (And we might we want to discuss whether coded-URL should be allowed as value as well). Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2016 22:01:45 UTC