Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?

On 31/10/2016 12:15 a.m., Samuel Williams wrote:
> Thanks Julian, yes I wondered if that was how it was being explained.
> It might be the wording of the sentence preceding the table:
>> would cause the following values to be associated:
> It might be clearer if it were "could be used to compute the following
> quality values:"

It is not computing quality values. The q values are provided by the
client. It is simply associating those q= values with the possible
response types.

Like so:
1) take the request Accept list
2a) sort by q= value
2b) drop explicit types that cannot be produced (ie xml/tar)
3) output the response for type at the front of the list

If you are writing a client to produce Accept lists, then you should do
the sorting step when generating the request so as to get faster
responses from the server.


Received on Monday, 31 October 2016 01:29:49 UTC