Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP

• From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
• Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 11:19:44 +1100
• To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
• Cc: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <CABkgnnVZeLQGES5Dige8u+ukSgqSfJNKiCuL=oK3gQnAb_3LNw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2 December 2016 at 11:09, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> In particular, my recollection of the outcome of the discussion of WS in H2 was that a new SETTING or a new ALPN token could be used to indicate that a connection supports both H2 and WS. If there's a problem with doing so, that would be good to talk about as well. Especially considering QUIC.

There seems to be some reluctance to exercise that option.  I don't
understand why; I've a bunch of candidate theories, but none of them
make a lot of sense.

Received on Friday, 2 December 2016 00:20:17 UTC