Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/
defn of blank nodes and triples RE: Review of 21-Nov concepts draft, part 3, sect 3-end
Quick review of RDF primer
Cancelling telecon 20021129
Regrets for 2002-11-29 telcon
The emperor's new datatypes
Yet more XSD/RDF
current Primer status
Minutes: telecon 2002-11-22
Concepts heads-up
More on XSD in RDF
- Re: More on XSD in RDF
- Re: More on XSD in RDF
rdfD1 rule and xsd-rules
Assertion and social meaning stuff - overlap semantics and concepts
parseType="Literal"
xsd:float and xsd:decimal
Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support.
- Re: Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support.
- Re: Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support.
- Re: Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support.
test case names - frag IDs
datatype test case
- Re: datatype test case (value spaces, rdfs:subClassOf)
- Re: datatype test case
closing 2002-06-17#5 re rdfs-isDefinedBy (RDFS TODO)
2002-06-17#1 re rdfms-seq-representation in RDFS
Regrets for Nov 29
Suggested URI reference text.
XML literal namespaces test cases
resurfacing
Domain and range proposed test cases
Re: The first sentence
Nov WDs do not link check
Semantic anchors
Primer revisions and schedule
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-11-22
2002-11-15#4 how to manage comments
2002-11-15#1 what to read to review datatypes
properties and namespaces question
Last Call publication process proposal
test case representation
freenet URIs and URI ownership
MITRE email will be out again this weekend
Brian's article on Jena
Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look)
Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...]
RDF Primer Primer
Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model
weekly call for agenda items
[w3c-rdfcore-wg] <none>
bnode entailment
Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...]
Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...]
- Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...]
- Re: Datatype test cases ...
- Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...]
do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...]
- Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...]
- Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...]
Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look)
- Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look)
- Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look)
- Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look)
- Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look)
- Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look)
- Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look)
- Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look)
- Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look)
- Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look)
- Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look)
- Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look)
- Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look)
- Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look)
Primer reification section
First bit of datatype test cases (for Jos): manifest support.
Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15
- concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15
- Re: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15
- Re: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15
- Re: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15
- Re: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15
TEST: datatype testcase
- RE: TEST: datatype testcase
- Re: TEST: datatype testcase
- Re: TEST: datatype testcase
- Re: TEST: datatype testcase
- Re: TEST: datatype testcase
rdfs:XMLLiteral -> rdf:XMLLiteral done (in RDFS)
Regrets
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-11-15
inter-document transfers
RDFS: new editors working draft URL
weekly call for agenda items
Publication of RDFCore working drafts
possible regrets
Re: testing http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/Manifest
ask webont to review docs
Publication of RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax
Publication of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)
2 new RDF WDs published: RDF Concepts, RDF/XML Syntax
testing http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/Manifest
Lbase cleanup now online
reviewing RDF Schema [was: RDFS snapshot]
MT document
negative progress on rdf semantics document.
RDFS snapshot
mt comments attached this time.
no critical problems found in model theory doc
Regrets for next two telecons
Re: Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT)
MT Error?
publish model theory
publish new test cases document
Thumbs up ntriples
RDF Test Cases WD for review & approval
More semantic comments
- Re: More semantic comments
NTriple review
- Re: NTriple review
- Re: NTriple review
- Re: NTriple review
- Re: NTriple review
- Re: NTriple review
- Re: NTriple review
- Re: NTriple review
- Re: NTriple review
Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDF S axioms]
- Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDF S axioms]
- Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDF S axioms]
review of Schema (quick)
Review of N-triples in test cases
rdfs closures
rdf:value ??
re lists
RDFS Schema
re: References Boiler Plate
Some semantics comments - more later.
Problem with how to think about lists
- Brian was being silly [was Re: Problem with how to think about lists]
- Re: Problem with how to think about lists
"recommended" semantics - attn pat, reviewers + connolly
- Re: "recommended" semantics - attn pat, reviewers + connolly
- Re: "recommended" semantics - attn pat, reviewers + connolly
Model theory review, thumbs up
- Re: Model theory review, thumbs up
- Re: Model theory review, thumbs up
- Re: Model theory review, thumbs up
Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil...
- Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil...
- Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil...
- Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil...
- Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil...
- Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil...
Thumbs down to schema
- Re: Thumbs down to schema
- response to Brian's rdfs review
- Re: response to Brian's rdfs review
- Re: response to Brian's rdfs review
- Re: response to Brian's rdfs review
- Re: response to Brian's rdfs review
- Re: response to Brian's rdfs review
- Lists vs collections. (was: Re: response to Brian's rdfs review)
- Re: Lists vs collections. (was: Re: response to Brian's rdfs review)
- Re: response to Brian's rdfs review
- Re: response to Brian's rdfs review
- Re: response to Brian's rdfs review
Model theory, possibly critical comment
Model theory, possibly critical comment
Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms]
Minutes of RDF Core Telecon 2002-11-08
Semantics thumbs up
Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms
- RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty?
- Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms
- Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms
- Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms
- Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms
- Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms
- Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms
- Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms
another MT point for reviewers
Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers.
- Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers.
- Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers.
- Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers.
- Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers.
XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs
- Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs
- Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs
- Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs
- Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs
- Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs
quick MT comment
Web Ontology Language (OWL) Guide W3C Working Draft 4 November 2002 (fwd)
RDFS editors working copy, help needed etc
- Re: RDFS editors working copy, help needed etc
- References boiler plate
- Re: RDFS editors working copy, help needed etc
MT draft
new Primer version
Re: Primer review -- thumbs up
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-11-08
Primer review -- partial - thumbs up
making publishing easier?
60+30 minute telecon
HELP (was Re: Lbase update: help pls w/ fixing to wellformed XHTML (Guha?))
quick comment on typed literals
- Re: quick comment on typed literals
- Re: quick comment on typed literals
- Re: quick comment on typed literals
MT editors draft
Lbase update: help pls w/ fixing to wellformed XHTML (Guha?)
rdfs help request: latest URIs for MT, Concepts, Syntax, Primer please
RDFS 'vs' DTDs: types of things, types of xml documents (was Re: RDF vs the rest of the world (fwd)
access to MT editors version
covering RDF applications in Primer
Syntax doc references
Primer reference in the Concepts doc
MITRE email will be out this weekend
Primer draft review - syntax section
thumbs up (with caveats) to primer
weekly call for agenda items
xml"foo" is dead
literal strings are what, exactly??
delete Primer section on Boolean-valued properties?
Status of this Document
more primer comments
FYI: RDF does not believe in same-document references
how to widen the Primer audience
Quick reviews of new abstract syntax?
rdf-concepts comments: this should be a note
- Re: rdf-concepts comments: this should be a note
Concepts document example
docsync: RDF URI Reference
comments on primer so far
- Re: comments on primer so far
Review of Datatyping content in Primer
danbri out monday (dental ickyness) (fwd)
Minutes of RDF Core Telcon 2002-11-01
A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase?
- Re: A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase?
- Re: A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase?
rdfs:Datatype question
Fwd: Member Survey: Encourage WG/IGs to encourage AC Reps to complete it
Re: new Primer version for review
road to publish concepts document
Summary of changes to 2002-10-24 RDF XML Syntax WD draft
Correction Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18]
Re: Syntax doc comments
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-25
Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18]
Re: Feedback request
- Re: Feedback request
- Re: Feedback request
- Re: Feedback request
- Re: Feedback request
- Re: Feedback request
Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18]
- Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18]
- Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18]
- Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18]
Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases
- Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases
- Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases
- Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases
Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema
Re: Issuette for tomorrow's aggenda
Re: prioritized list of 'issuettes'
on RDF concepts: thumbs up, contingent on a few things
- Re: on RDF concepts: thumbs up, contingent on a few things
- Re: on RDF concepts: thumbs up, contingent on a few things