- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 09:51:31 +0000
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 23:46 31/10/2002 -0600, pat hayes wrote: >Just how minimal do we want the list semantics to be? In particular, is >this satisfiable? : > >7. >rdf:nil rdf:rest _:xxx . > >? Or can I rule that out? If not, our claim that lists are bounded seems >rather hollow, and that was the point of having them in the first place..... Here I want to float an idea I have mentioned offline to Pat. Would it make sense to restrict the structure of collections in the *abtract syntax*. Don't worry Dave, I don't think it affects the XML syntax - it can only produce well formed lists already. We write the abstract syntax so that lists must be syntactically well formed. Anything else is not well formed RDF. Brian
Received on Friday, 1 November 2002 04:48:57 UTC