- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 18:23:39 -0600
- To: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> > Anyone up to doing a very quick review of the modified abstract syntax >... >> >> >http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/RDF-concepts/2002-11-05/rdf-concepts.html > > >re: #section-Graph-syntax >one comment I have is on > The subject may not be an RDF literal. > >for a plain literal maybe OK, but a typed literal >can be a perfect subject Not in my version. Literals are not subjects, and that includes all forms of literals. Subjects are urirefs or bnodes, and that is all. Pat >e.g. > "10"^^xsd:int xsd:int "10". syntax error: subject: "'10"^^xsd:int' is not a legal uriref. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 19:23:24 UTC