- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 10:46:38 -0500 (EST)
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Brian McBride wrote: > I think it could go with the table not being updated. I want to make sure the RDF/XML content is accurate. Since this also appears in Appendix B, more work is needed and we may as well regen the table. But getting the RDF/XML right is the main thing, since I will also be updating the live RDFS namespace and I don't really want to get that wrong. > This is in better shape than I thought. I'm back online for a few > hours. How can I help. > > I had trouble with CVS this morning, but it seems ok now. Re help, getting the references to our other specs in shape would be good. After that, getting the rdfs:label and rdfs:comment for each of the new things is the next step. There is candidate text in the prose I added to RDFS (in the bit after the big table) but probably needs tweaking a little. Help with that (ie. drafting chunks of rdf/xml to add) would be much appreciated. cheers, dan
Received on Saturday, 9 November 2002 10:47:41 UTC