- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 21:57:38 -0600
- To: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>Hi Pat,
>
>in http://users.skynet.be/jdroo/euler/rdfs-rules
>we simplified rdfD1 as follows
>
> { ?d a rdfs:Datatype } log:implies { ?x^^?d a ?d } .
But that has a literal subject, which is forbidden. I agree that if
we could have literal subjects, this would be an obviously valid rule
(better, it IS valid, but its syntactically illegal.)
>
>and we also made http://users.skynet.be/jdroo/euler/xsd-rules
>and so we have that
>
> :jenny :age "10"^^xsd:integer .
>
>rdfs-xsd-entails
>
> :jenny :age _:x .
> _:x rdf:type xsd:decimal .
>
>per rdfs9 and rdfD1
>
>-- ,
>Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC (850)434 8903 home
40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office
Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax
FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Saturday, 30 November 2002 23:54:09 UTC