Re: inter-document transfers

Ah, yes.  I started to look at the primer on the plane coming over, but 
realized I'd managed to grab an older version.  Thanks for the 
reminder.  I'll grab the latest and try to look through this by the weekend.

#g
--

At 02:04 PM 11/14/02 -0500, Frank Manola wrote:

>This seems like a good cue to revisit the item
>
>2002-11-01#3  frankm  Discuss overlap between primer & concepts with
>               concepts editors
>
>I would be particularly interested in:
>
>(a) the Concepts editors' opinions on what overlaps should be *removed*
>from the Primer in favor of pointers to the Concepts document.
>
>(b) followup from Jeremy on his "multiple document" idea (assuming
>there's still time to do that), about what things he'd put in which
>documents.  I'd note in this connection that if you break the Primer up
>like that, there would seem to be more scope for doing stuff like
>
> > >   o 2.1 => primer
> > >   o 2.2 => primer
>
>since it wouldn't necessarily get between the reader and more important
>things in a "quick start" section.
>
>--Frank
>
>Graham Klyne wrote:
> >
> > At 04:20 PM 11/14/02 +0000, Brian McBride wrote:
> > >I'd like to propose a small number of transfers between docs and invite
> > >folks to suggest others they feel would be appropriate.
> > >
> > >Concepts:
> >
> > With reference to:
> >    http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-concepts-20021108/
> >
> > >   o 1.2 => primer
> >
> > Yes.  (Also, the cited references should move over)
> >
> > >   o 2.1 => primer
> > >   o 2.2 => primer
> >
> > I'm agnostic-to-mildly-against:
> >
> > These don't really fit with the stated goal of the primer:
> > [[
> > This Primer is designed to provide the reader with the basic knowledge
> > required to effectively use RDF. It introduces the basic concepts of RDF
> > and describes its XML syntax. It describes how to define RDF vocabularies
> > using the RDF Vocabulary Description Language, and gives an overview of
> > some deployed RDF applications. It also describes the content and purpose
> > of other RDF specification documents.
> > ]]
> > -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-primer-20021111/
> >
> > but I'm happy to go with the WG consensus.
> >
> > #g
> >
> > -------------------
> > Graham Klyne
> > <GK@NineByNine.org>
>
>--
>Frank Manola                   The MITRE Corporation
>202 Burlington Road, MS A345   Bedford, MA 01730-1420
>mailto:fmanola@mitre.org       voice: 781-271-8147   FAX: 781-271-8752

-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>

Received on Thursday, 14 November 2002 14:42:27 UTC