RE: mt comments attached this time. from Brian McBride on 2002-11-11 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from November 2002)

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 22:38:20 +0000
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021111223741.02f19858@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>

At 22:17 11/11/2002 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>A quick comment that Brian's proposed rule:
>
>xxx rdf:type rdf:Seq .
>
>_:xxx rdf:_nnn _:yyy .
>
>entails
>
>_:xxx rdf:_mmm _:zzz .
>
>when nnn > 1 and mmm = nnn-1
>
>was one that I had thought we had decided against ...

You are probably right.  I don't want to re-open old issues.

Brian

Received on Monday, 11 November 2002 17:36:46 UTC