- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:50:59 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
>>>Graham Klyne said:
>
> While I agree they are not always easy to use, I don't see how they are
> difficult to *maintain*.
>
> I don't think we should *remove* them at this time, though I am happy to
> see additional named anchors added. When we have confirmation that no
> other documents link to the auto-generated 'xtocid' anchors we can think
> about removing them.
You should not remove them. They are used in the RDF/XML WD and will
break the published documents if you change them. This isn't
something you should do.
They are:
Triple
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#xtocid103646
RDF Graph
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#xtocid48021
5.1 Character normalization
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#xtocid48034
Dave
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 05:54:11 UTC