W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:50:59 +0000
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <12650.1037703059@hoth.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

>>>Graham Klyne said:
> While I agree they are not always easy to use, I don't see how they are 
> difficult to *maintain*.
> I don't think we should *remove* them at this time, though I am happy to 
> see additional named anchors added.  When we have confirmation that no 
> other documents link to the auto-generated 'xtocid' anchors we can think 
> about removing them.

You should not remove them.  They are used in the RDF/XML WD and will
break the published documents if you change them.  This isn't
something you should do.

They are:

    RDF Graph

    5.1 Character normalization

Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 05:54:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:18 UTC