- From: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 14:38:19 -0800
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0185.html Transcript: http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2002-11-08 Attended: Pat Hayes, Brian McBride (chair), Dave Beckett, Eric Miller, Frank Manola, Mike Dean (scribe), Aaron Swartz (co-scribe), Graham Klyne, Jos DeRoo, Dan Brickley, Jeremy Carroll Regrets: Dan Connolly, Jan Grant Minutes of the 2002-11-01 telecon were approved with the correction that Jos was not present. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0058.html Actions 2002-11-01#7, 2002-11-01#8, 2002-11-01#12 bwm were completed. The concepts document was submitted to the pubteam, completing 2002-11-01#1. Dave Beckett noted that he was preparing another draft of the syntax document for publication, but 2002-11-01#2 was completed. Frank Manola said that he's put up a new draft of the primer with all critical changes. DECIDED: Publish primer with editor's discretion ACTION Eric Miller: publish RDF primer document Brian McBride noted that he'd cleaned up the HTML of the Model Theory and placed a copy in the archive. This is the copy that should be reviewed by Monday night. ACTION Graham Klyne: review model theory draft by Monday night ACTION Jeremy Carroll: review model theory draft by Monday night DECIDED: publish model theory with editor's discretion ACTION Eric Miller: publish model theory upon receipt from editor http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Nov/0022.html The abstract syntax currently uses the term RDF URI reference for an absolute IRI with optional fragment identifier. Dan Connolly (in email) didn't like this. Jeremy suggested we call them absolute URI references. Aaron Swartz said that this would be confusing, since they aren't necessarily URI references. DECIDED: Every document would define URIRef when introducing it with the special RDF meaning. ACTION Jeremy Carroll: write up boilerplate to define URIRef with the special RDF meaning. Dan Brickley was very happy with the current RDF Schema draft and noticed it was the one document getting shorter. ACTION Jos DeRoo: review RDF Schema draft by Monday ACTION Brian McBride: review RDF Schema draft by Monday DECIDED: publish RDF Schema with editor's discretion ACTION Eric Miller: publish RDF Schema upon receipt from editor Most of the work on the Test Cases document has been done; only section 3 is being updated. More work on the test cases themselves is required. Eric Miller noted that frequent updates to the Editor's Draft with messages to developers via the rdf-ig email list will be important to avoid a long Candidate Review period. ACTION Dave Beckett: add ntriples to test cases, archive review copy by Monday morning ACTION Jeremy Carroll: review Test Cases draft by Monday ACTION Jos DeRoo: review Test Cases draft by Monday DECIDED: publish Test Cases with editor's discretion ACTION Eric Miller: publish Test Cases upon receipt from editor Our schedule is very tight, but we seem to be meeting it so far. Jeremy suggested an extra week to focus on trimming our documents. Next week's telecon is expected to focus on the documents. We'll check our schedule progress then.
Received on Friday, 8 November 2002 17:38:55 UTC