- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 19:58:28 -0500 (EST)
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, <fmanola@attbi.com>
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, pat hayes wrote: > >As discussed on the telecon, RDFS editors draft currently has an "@@ find > >out what the MT says" TODO regarding this question. Can you let me know > >what the current situation is, so RDFS can reflect that? > > > >rdfs:member is a super-property of each of rdf:_1, rdf:_2, etc. We call > >these the container member properties, and have them as members of > >rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty. Do we have rdfs:member in that class as > >well? > > The MT is completely agnostic on the issue. The currently frozen > draft says No, but it could say Yes just as easily by changing two > lines in the document. If you want me to toss a coin, I can do that. > Or, you tell me. Lets say 'no, it isn't', in that case. Dan
Received on Friday, 8 November 2002 19:58:38 UTC