- From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 11:11:34 +0000
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 02:19 PM 11/9/02 -0600, pat hayes wrote: >>Given that the D-interpretation is defined in terms of a given set D of >>datatypes, it seems to me that it should be possible to define some rules >>in terms of the L2V of those datatypes (which I take to be equivalent to >>"consulting the datatype sources"). I don't have time right now to think >>this through, but it would be interesting to see if there's something >>more satisfying (sic) that can be said here. > >I think it can be said in terms of large/countable sets of equations. I >will try to make some useful remarks along these lines: check the doc in a >few hours to see. > >No doubt one ought to talk about facets, but I really have trouble >following the XML docs at that point. Ive been using numbers all my life >and I never noticed they had facets before. I'm not sure that we want to get drawn into facets here... that would seem to make the datatyping very XML-schema centric, rather than having the schema datatyping as primus inter pares. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Sunday, 10 November 2002 06:47:22 UTC