W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: rdfs help request: latest URIs for MT, Concepts, Syntax, Primer please

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:33:05 -0600
Message-Id: <p05111b10b9f05191d0e4@[]>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>At 18:50 06/11/2002 -0600, pat hayes wrote:
>>Add some datatypes:
>>If sss is a legal lexical form for ddd then
>>aaa ppp "sss"^^ddd .
>>ddd a rdfs:Datatype .
>>aaa ppp -:xxx .
>>_:xxx a ddd .
>Are there technical reasons why sss has to be legal for this 
>entailment.  Would it make sense that just be using ddd in that 
>position in a literal, one is asserting that its a datatype.  Of 
>course one, might be wrong; but that's not RDF's business.

The problem with that line is that adding datatypes produces a 
nonmonotonic inference (when you discover that since the typed 
literal is illegal, it doesnt denote anything in the ddd value 
space). So thats why it is RDF's business, in a sense. Sure, RDF 
can't know which things are legal all by itself, but it needs to not 
unilaterally assume that they are all legal, in case you are not.


IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2002 12:32:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:18 UTC