- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 09:05:40 -0500
- To: fmanola@mitre.org
- CC: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@mimesweeper.com>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
(onlist) Just a notification that I'm going to change the Primer references to be the same as those in both the Syntax and Concepts docs (e.g., RDF-VOCABULARY instead of RDF-SCHEMA). But have we decided whether M&S is normative or not (or can a document be normative for one spec and not normative for another)? M&S is still normative in Syntax and informational in Concepts. --Frank -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-875
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 08:53:08 UTC