w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from November 2002 by author

Aaron Swartz

• RDF Primer Primer (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: fighting complexification (was: rdf-concepts comments: this should be a note) (Tuesday, 5 November)
• fighting complexification (was: rdf-concepts comments: this should be a note) (Tuesday, 5 November)
• fighting complexification (was: rdf-concepts comments: this should be a note) (Tuesday, 5 November)
• rdf-concepts comments: this should be a note (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: docsync: RDF URI Reference (Tuesday, 5 November)

Brian McBride

• Re: parseType="Literal" (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal (Thursday, 28 November)
• Cancelling telecon 20021129 (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] (Thursday, 28 November)
• Copyright on xsd schema doc [was: Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: The emperor's new datatypes (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: closing 2002-06-17#5 re rdfs-isDefinedBy (RDFS TODO) (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: The emperor's new datatypes (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: More on XSD in RDF (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: datatype test case (value spaces, rdfs:subClassOf) (Friday, 22 November)
• datatype test case (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: The first sentence (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: early uniform normalization RE: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 (Thursday, 21 November)
• 2002-11-15#4 how to manage comments (Thursday, 21 November)
• 2002-11-15#1 what to read to review datatypes (Thursday, 21 November)
• properties and namespaces question (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Thursday, 21 November)
• RE: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 (Thursday, 21 November)
• test case representation (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Thursday, 21 November)
• weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 20 November)
• [w3c-rdfcore-wg] <none> (Wednesday, 20 November)
• bnode entailment (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Wednesday, 20 November)
• do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Primer reification section (Wednesday, 20 November)
• another interdoc transfer: semantics (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Regrets for next two telecons (Thursday, 14 November)
• inter-document transfers (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: RDFS: new editors working draft URL (Thursday, 14 November)
• weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Publication of RDFCore working drafts (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: ask webont to review docs (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: testing http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/Manifest (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Regrets for next two telecons (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: More semantic comments (XML Schema value spaces) (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: References Boiler Plate (Tuesday, 12 November)
• RE: mt comments attached this time. (Monday, 11 November)
• mt comments attached this time. (Monday, 11 November)
• no critical problems found in model theory doc (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: NTriple review (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Model theory review, thumbs up (Monday, 11 November)
• NOT MT Error? (Monday, 11 November)
• MT Error? (Monday, 11 November)
• re: References Boiler Plate (Monday, 11 November)
• publish model theory (Monday, 11 November)
• publish new test cases document (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: NTriple review (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: NTriple review (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Model theory review, thumbs up (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDF S axioms] (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Lists vs collections. (was: Re: response to Brian's rdfs review) (Monday, 11 November)
• re: References Boiler Plate (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms] (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Monday, 11 November)
• re: References Boiler Plate (Sunday, 10 November)
• Brian was being silly [was Re: Problem with how to think about lists] (Saturday, 9 November)
• Problem with how to think about lists (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: response to Brian's rdfs review (Saturday, 9 November)
• References boiler plate (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil... (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: response to Brian's rdfs review (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms] (Saturday, 9 November)
• Thumbs down to schema (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty? (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: MT draft (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: RDFS draft (was Re: MT draft) (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: MT draft (Friday, 8 November)
• making publishing easier? (Thursday, 7 November)
• 60+30 minute telecon (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: access to MT editors version (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: MT editors draft (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: quick comment on typed literals (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: rdfs help request: latest URIs for MT, Concepts, Syntax, Primer please (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: covering RDF applications in Primer (Wednesday, 6 November)
• with attachment this time [was thumbs up (with caveats) to primer] (Wednesday, 6 November)
• thumbs up (with caveats) to primer (Wednesday, 6 November)
• weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: Quick reviews of new abstract syntax? (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question (Wednesday, 6 November)
• more primer comments (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: comments on primer so far (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: docsync: RDF URI Reference (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: comments on primer so far (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: rdf-concepts comments: this should be a note (Tuesday, 5 November)
• MUST FIX [was Re: Concepts document example] (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: docsync: RDF URI Reference (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: Review of Datatyping content in Primer (Monday, 4 November)
• docsync: RDF URI Reference (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: comments on primer so far (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: on RDF concepts: thumbs up, contingent on a few things (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase? (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: comments on primer so far (Monday, 4 November)
• comments on primer so far (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question (Saturday, 2 November)
• Fwd: Member Survey: Encourage WG/IGs to encourage AC Reps to complete it (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: more feedback (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: more feedback (re-open #rdfms-seq-representation?) (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: more feedback (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Feedback request (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema (Friday, 1 November)

bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com

• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-11-22 (Thursday, 21 November)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-11-15 (Thursday, 14 November)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-11-08 (Thursday, 7 November)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-25 (Friday, 1 November)

by way of

• MITRE email will be out this weekend (Wednesday, 6 November)

Dan Brickley

• closing 2002-06-17#5 re rdfs-isDefinedBy (RDFS TODO) (Friday, 22 November)
• 2002-06-17#1 re rdfms-seq-representation in RDFS (Friday, 22 November)
• resurfacing (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Primer reification section (Tuesday, 19 November)
• rdfs:XMLLiteral -> rdf:XMLLiteral done (in RDFS) (Friday, 15 November)
• RDFS: new editors working draft URL (Thursday, 14 November)
• Lbase cleanup now online (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: reviewing RDF Schema [was: RDFS snapshot] (Tuesday, 12 November)
• RDFS snapshot (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: rdf:value ?? (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: response to Brian's rdfs review (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: response to Brian's rdfs review (Saturday, 9 November)
• response to Brian's rdfs review (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty? (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty? (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Friday, 8 November)
• RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty? (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs (Friday, 8 November)
• Web Ontology Language (OWL) Guide W3C Working Draft 4 November 2002 (fwd) (Friday, 8 November)
• RDFS editors working copy, help needed etc (Friday, 8 November)
• RDFS draft (was Re: MT draft) (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: HELP (was Re: Lbase update: help pls w/ fixing to wellformed XHTML (Guha?)) (Thursday, 7 November)
• Lbase update: help pls w/ fixing to wellformed XHTML (Guha?) (Wednesday, 6 November)
• rdfs help request: latest URIs for MT, Concepts, Syntax, Primer please (Wednesday, 6 November)
• RDFS 'vs' DTDs: types of things, types of xml documents (was Re: RDF vs the rest of the world (fwd) (Wednesday, 6 November)
• danbri out monday (dental ickyness) (fwd) (Monday, 4 November)

Dan Connolly

• Re: The emperor's new datatypes (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: Yet more XSD/RDF (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: More on XSD in RDF (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: datatype test case (value spaces, rdfs:subClassOf) (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: datatype test case (value spaces, rdfs:subClassOf) (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support. (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support. (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: datatype test case (value spaces, rdfs:subClassOf) (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: 2002-06-17#1 re rdfms-seq-representation in RDFS (Friday, 22 November)
• RE: freenet URIs and URI ownership (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: freenet URIs and URI ownership (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Primer reification section (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: inter-document transfers (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: Publication of RDFCore working drafts (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: More semantic comments (XML Schema value spaces) (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: More semantic comments (XML Schema value spaces) (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: More semantic comments (XML Schema value spaces) (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs (Friday, 8 November)
• XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: new Primer version (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: covering RDF applications in Primer (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: literal strings are what, exactly?? (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: delete Primer section on Boolean-valued properties? (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: delete Primer section on Boolean-valued properties? (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: comments on primer so far (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: comments on primer so far (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: docsync: RDF URI Reference (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: docsync: RDF URI Reference (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: on RDF concepts: thumbs up, contingent on a few things (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: more feedback (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: more feedback (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: more feedback (re-open #rdfms-seq-representation?) (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: more feedback (re-open #rdfms-seq-representation?) (Friday, 1 November)
• on RDF concepts: thumbs up, contingent on a few things (Friday, 1 November)

Dave Beckett

• Regrets for 2002-11-29 telcon (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Concepts heads-up (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: More on XSD in RDF (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: Publication of RDFCore working drafts (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Publication of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) (Tuesday, 12 November)
• 2 new RDF WDs published: RDF Concepts, RDF/XML Syntax (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: NTriple review (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: publish new test cases document (Monday, 11 November)
• RDF Test Cases WD for review & approval (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: NTriple review (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: NTriple review (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Review of N-triples in test cases (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: NTriple review (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: Lists vs collections. (was: Re: response to Brian's rdfs review) (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: re lists (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil... (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: Syntax doc references (Thursday, 7 November)
• Primer draft review - syntax section (Wednesday, 6 November)
• xml"foo" is dead (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: Primer synch with other documents (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Minutes of RDF Core Telcon 2002-11-01 (Sunday, 3 November)
• Summary of changes to 2002-10-24 RDF XML Syntax WD draft (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Feedback request (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Syntax doc comments (Friday, 1 November)

Eric Miller

• Publication of RDFCore working drafts (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Publication of RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Publication of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) (Tuesday, 12 November)
• road to publish concepts document (Friday, 1 November)

Frank Manola

• Re: Quick review of RDF primer (Friday, 29 November)
• Re: Regrets for 2002-11-29 telcon (Thursday, 28 November)
• current Primer status (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: The first sentence (Friday, 22 November)
• Primer revisions and schedule (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: freenet URIs and URI ownership (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: freenet URIs and URI ownership (Thursday, 21 November)
• MITRE email will be out again this weekend (Thursday, 21 November)
• Brian's article on Jena (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: inter-document transfers (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Primer reification section (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Primer reification section (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: inter-document transfers (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-11-15 (Thursday, 14 November)
• new publications (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: References Boiler Plate (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: RDFS snapshot (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Lists vs collections. (was: Re: response to Brian's rdfs review) (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Lists vs collections. (was: Re: response to Brian's rdfs review) (Sunday, 10 November)
• review of Schema (quick) (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: RDFS editors working copy, help needed etc (Saturday, 9 November)
• re: References Boiler Plate (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: Primer review -- partial - thumbs up (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: new Primer version (Friday, 8 November)
• new Primer version (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: Primer review -- partial - thumbs up (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: delete Primer section on Boolean-valued properties? (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: covering RDF applications in Primer (Wednesday, 6 November)
• covering RDF applications in Primer (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Syntax doc references (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Primer reference in the Concepts doc (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: Primer draft review - syntax section (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: Primer synch with other documents (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: delete Primer section on Boolean-valued properties? (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: delete Primer section on Boolean-valued properties? (Wednesday, 6 November)
• delete Primer section on Boolean-valued properties? (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: comments on primer so far (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: Primer synch with other documents (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: comments on primer so far (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: comments on primer so far (Tuesday, 5 November)
• how to widen the Primer audience (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: comments on primer so far (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Concepts document example (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: Review of Datatyping content in Primer (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: comments on primer so far (Monday, 4 November)
• Primer synch with other documents (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: comments on primer so far (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: Feedback request (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: new Primer version for review (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Feedback request (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Feedback request (Friday, 1 November)

Graham Klyne

• Quick review of RDF primer (Thursday, 28 November)
• The emperor's new datatypes (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Monday, 25 November)
• RE: weekly call for agenda items (Monday, 25 November)
• Graphs and documents (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support. (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: parseType="Literal" (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Monday, 25 November)
• RE: freenet URIs and URI ownership (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: Last Call publication process proposal (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: freenet URIs and URI ownership (Monday, 25 November)
• Using third-party vocabularies (Monday, 25 November)
• Authoritative definition of a predicate (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Monday, 25 November)
• RE: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: inter-document transfers (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: inter-document transfers (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Regrets for next two telecons (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Regrets for next two telecons (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: MT document (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: negative progress on rdf semantics document. (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: NTriple review (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Model theory review, thumbs up (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: NTriple review (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Review of N-triples in test cases (Monday, 11 November)
• Regrets for next two telecons (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil... (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: Problem with how to think about lists (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: Lists vs collections. (was: Re: response to Brian's rdfs review) (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: Model theory review, thumbs up (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers. (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: Model theory, possibly critical comment (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: "recommended" semantics - attn pat, reviewers + connolly (Sunday, 10 November)
• Review of N-triples in test cases (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Saturday, 9 November)
• Model theory review, thumbs up (Saturday, 9 November)
• Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil... (Saturday, 9 November)
• Model theory, possibly critical comment (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers. (Saturday, 9 November)
• Model theory, possibly critical comment (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: making publishing easier? (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: quick comment on typed literals (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: Primer reference in the Concepts doc (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: Primer synch with other documents (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: Concepts document example (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: on RDF concepts: thumbs up, contingent on a few things (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: on RDF concepts: thumbs up, contingent on a few things (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question (Sunday, 3 November)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Sunday, 3 November)
• Re: Feedback request (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: more feedback (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: more feedback (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: new Primer version for review (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Feedback request (Friday, 1 November)

Henry S. Thompson

• Re: More semantic comments (XML Schema value spaces) (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Monday, 4 November)

Jan Grant

• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal (Thursday, 28 November)
• Re: Yet more XSD/RDF (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: More on XSD in RDF (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: More on XSD in RDF (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: More on XSD in RDF (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Minutes: telecon 2002-11-22 (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support. (Saturday, 23 November)
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal (Saturday, 23 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support. (Saturday, 23 November)
• Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support. (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: First bit of datatype test cases (for Jos): manifest support. (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Tuesday, 19 November)
• First bit of datatype test cases (for Jos): manifest support. (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: TEST: datatype testcase (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: fighting complexification (was: rdf-concepts comments: this should be a note) (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: rdf-concepts comments: this should be a note (Tuesday, 5 November)

Jeremy Carroll

• defn of blank nodes and triples RE: Review of 21-Nov concepts draft, part 3, sect 3-end (Friday, 29 November)
• RE: parseType="Literal" (Friday, 29 November)
• RE: Yet more XSD/RDF (Tuesday, 26 November)
• RE: weekly call for agenda items (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Yet more XSD/RDF (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: Last Call publication process proposal (Monday, 25 November)
• RE: Concepts heads-up (Monday, 25 November)
• Concepts heads-up (Monday, 25 November)
• RE: More on XSD in RDF (Monday, 25 November)
• More on XSD in RDF (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: datatype test case (value spaces, rdfs:subClassOf) (Friday, 22 November)
• Assertion and social meaning stuff - overlap semantics and concepts (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support. (Friday, 22 November)
• parseType="Literal" (Friday, 22 November)
• xsd:float and xsd:decimal (Friday, 22 November)
• test case names - frag IDs (Friday, 22 November)
• Suggested URI reference text. (Friday, 22 November)
• RE: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 (Friday, 22 November)
• XML literal namespaces test cases (Friday, 22 November)
• Domain and range proposed test cases (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: The first sentence (Friday, 22 November)
• Nov WDs do not link check (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: early uniform normalization RE: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: freenet URIs and URI ownership (Thursday, 21 November)
• Semantic anchors (Thursday, 21 November)
• RE: freenet URIs and URI ownership (Thursday, 21 November)
• early uniform normalization RE: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 (Thursday, 21 November)
• RE: freenet URIs and URI ownership (Thursday, 21 November)
• RE: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 (Thursday, 21 November)
• Last Call publication process proposal (Thursday, 21 November)
• freenet URIs and URI ownership (Thursday, 21 November)
• RE: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Thursday, 21 November)
• RE: weekly call for agenda items (Thursday, 21 November)
• RE: weekly call for agenda items (Thursday, 21 November)
• RE: weekly call for agenda items (Thursday, 21 November)
• RE: weekly call for agenda items (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: inter-document transfers (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases ... (Wednesday, 20 November)
• RE: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 (Tuesday, 19 November)
• concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 (Monday, 18 November)
• RE: TEST: datatype testcase (Monday, 18 November)
• ask webont to review docs (Wednesday, 13 November)
• RE: mt comments attached this time. (Monday, 11 November)
• RE: NTriple review (Monday, 11 November)
• Thumbs up ntriples (Monday, 11 November)
• More semantic comments (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: NTriple review (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Some semantics comments - more later. (Monday, 11 November)
• NTriple review (Monday, 11 November)
• Some semantics comments - more later. (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: Semantics thumbs up (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: Thumbs down to schema (Saturday, 9 November)
• "recommended" semantics - attn pat, reviewers + connolly (Saturday, 9 November)
• Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms] (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty? (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Friday, 8 November)
• Semantics thumbs up (Friday, 8 November)
• RE: Primer review -- partial - thumbs up (Friday, 8 November)
• Primer review -- partial - thumbs up (Thursday, 7 November)
• RE: making publishing easier? (Thursday, 7 November)
• RE: 60+30 minute telecon (Thursday, 7 November)
• RE: access to MT editors version (Thursday, 7 November)
• Status of this Document (Tuesday, 5 November)
• FYI: RDF does not believe in same-document references (Tuesday, 5 November)
• RE: Quick reviews of new abstract syntax? (Tuesday, 5 November)
• RE: Primer synch with other documents (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: docsync: RDF URI Reference (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Quick reviews of new abstract syntax? (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase? (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: prioritized list of 'issuettes' (Sunday, 3 November)
• Re: Feedback request (Sunday, 3 November)
• A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase? (Sunday, 3 November)
• Re: prioritized list of 'issuettes' (Friday, 1 November)

Jos De_Roo

• Re: Yet more XSD/RDF (Tuesday, 26 November)
• rdfD1 rule and xsd-rules (Sunday, 24 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases/ datatype entailment/ datatype support. (Saturday, 23 November)
• Re: datatype test case (value spaces, rdfs:subClassOf) (Saturday, 23 November)
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal (Saturday, 23 November)
• Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: TEST: datatype testcase (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: TEST: datatype testcase (Monday, 18 November)
• TEST: datatype testcase (Sunday, 17 November)
• possible regrets (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: reviewing RDF Schema [was: RDFS snapshot] (Tuesday, 12 November)
• testing http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/Manifest (Tuesday, 12 November)
• reviewing RDF Schema [was: RDFS snapshot] (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: NTriple review (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: NTriple review (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Model theory review, thumbs up (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: rdfs closures (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: rdfs closures (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: rdfs closures (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil... (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: re lists (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: rdfs closures (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: response to Brian's rdfs review (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil... (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: RDFS editors working copy, help needed etc (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty? (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty? (Friday, 8 November)
• quick MT comment (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: access to MT editors version (Wednesday, 6 November)
• RE: Quick reviews of new abstract syntax? (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: Quick reviews of new abstract syntax? (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase? (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: Minutes of RDF Core Telcon 2002-11-01 (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Feedback request (Friday, 1 November)

Mike Dean

• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-11-22 (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-11-15 (Thursday, 14 November)
• Minutes of RDF Core Telecon 2002-11-08 (Friday, 8 November)

pat hayes

• Re: More on XSD in RDF (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-schema-20021112/ (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: rdfD1 rule and xsd-rules (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: More on XSD in RDF (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: datatype test case (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: datatype test case (value spaces, rdfs:subClassOf) (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model (Thursday, 21 November)
• RE: weekly call for agenda items (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: bnode entailment (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Primer reification section (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: First bit of datatype test cases (for Jos): manifest support. (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15 (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: TEST: datatype testcase (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: More semantic comments (XML Schema value spaces) (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: More semantic comments (XML Schema value spaces) (Wednesday, 13 November)
• Re: More semantic comments (XML Schema value spaces) (Wednesday, 13 November)
• MT document (Tuesday, 12 November)
• negative progress on rdf semantics document. (Tuesday, 12 November)
• Re: More semantic comments (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Model theory review, thumbs up (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Some semantics comments - more later. (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Reflexivity of subClassOf and subPropertyOf (was: Re: comments on RDF MT) (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDF S axioms] (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: quick comment on typed literals (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Lists vs collections. (was: Re: response to Brian's rdfs review) (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Lists vs collections. (was: Re: response to Brian's rdfs review) (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: rdfs closures (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: response to Brian's rdfs review (Sunday, 10 November)
• rdfs closures (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: References boiler plate (Sunday, 10 November)
• Lists vs collections. (was: Re: response to Brian's rdfs review) (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: Semantics thumbs up (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: response to Brian's rdfs review (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs (Sunday, 10 November)
• re: References Boiler Plate (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: Some semantics comments - more later. (Sunday, 10 November)
• Re: rdf:value ?? (Sunday, 10 November)
• rdf:value ?? (Saturday, 9 November)
• re lists (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: "recommended" semantics - attn pat, reviewers + connolly (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms] (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: RDFS editors working copy, help needed etc (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil... (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: XMLLiteral belongs in RDF namespace, not RDFs (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Saturday, 9 November)
• RDFS Schema (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: Model theory review, thumbs up (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers. (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: Model theory, possibly critical comment (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty? (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty? (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers. (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Friday, 8 November)
• another MT point for reviewers (Friday, 8 November)
• Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers. (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: quick comment on typed literals (Friday, 8 November)
• MT draft (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: rdfs help request: latest URIs for MT, Concepts, Syntax, Primer please (Thursday, 7 November)
• HELP (was Re: Lbase update: help pls w/ fixing to wellformed XHTML (Guha?)) (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: delete Primer section on Boolean-valued properties? (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: rdfs help request: latest URIs for MT, Concepts, Syntax, Primer please (Thursday, 7 November)
• quick comment on typed literals (Thursday, 7 November)
• MT editors draft (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: access to MT editors version (Thursday, 7 November)
• access to MT editors version (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: Primer synch with other documents (Wednesday, 6 November)
• literal strings are what, exactly?? (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: Primer synch with other documents (Wednesday, 6 November)
• RE: Quick reviews of new abstract syntax? (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: Quick reviews of new abstract syntax? (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question (Tuesday, 5 November)
• rdfs:Datatype question (Saturday, 2 November)
• Re: Feedback request (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Feedback request (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Feedback request (Friday, 1 November)
• not a test case. (was: Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases) (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: more feedback (re-open #rdfms-seq-representation?) (Friday, 1 November)
• more feedback (Friday, 1 November)

Patrick Stickler

• Re: Copyright on xsd schema doc [was: Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] (Friday, 29 November)
• Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] (Friday, 29 November)
• Clarifying what datatype entailment support means (Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal) (Friday, 29 November)
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal (Friday, 29 November)
• Re: Yet more XSD/RDF (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: More on XSD in RDF (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: More on XSD in RDF (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: More on XSD in RDF (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: More on XSD in RDF (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: More on XSD in RDF (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: More on XSD in RDF (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: More on XSD in RDF (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: More on XSD in RDF (Monday, 25 November)
• Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal (Sunday, 24 November)
• Regrets for Nov 29 (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: weekly call for agenda items (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: weekly call for agenda items (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: weekly call for agenda items (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases ... (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...] (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) (Thursday, 21 November)
• Regrets (Friday, 15 November)
• Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDF S axioms] (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Minutes of RDF Core Telecon 2002-11-08 (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: quick comment on typed literals (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers. (Monday, 11 November)
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: comments on primer so far (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: docsync: RDF URI Reference (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase? (Monday, 4 November)
• Review of Datatyping content in Primer (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: A datatype entailment - this should be a testcase? (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question (Monday, 4 November)
• Re: rdfs:Datatype question (Saturday, 2 November)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Saturday, 2 November)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Feedback request (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Issuette for tomorrow's aggenda (Friday, 1 November)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers. (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers. (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: Technical tweaks to the MT, for reviewers. (Friday, 8 November)

Stephen Petschulat

• Re: Primer review -- thumbs up (Thursday, 7 November)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Tuesday, 5 November)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Friday, 1 November)
• Correction Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Friday, 1 November)

Last message date: Saturday, 30 November 2002 23:54:40 UTC