Re: MT document

At 12:33 AM 11/12/02 -0600, pat hayes wrote:
>It still has the RFC 2119 language in it: Graham, can you live with that?? 
>If not, I can do a quick purge.

Even if I thought it were truly important (which I don't), I'd be hard 
pushed to suggest you change it at this juncture.  Please go for 
publication and take a well-earned rest (from this document, at least).

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>

Received on Tuesday, 12 November 2002 06:41:39 UTC