W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-11-08

From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 19:31:20 GMT
Message-ID: <3813754.1036697646533.JavaMail.bwm@MCBRIDE-B-6>
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

10:00:00 Fri Nov 08 2002 in America/New York

which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Nov 08 2002 in Europe/London

Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore

1: Scribes
This weeks volunteer scribe is Mike Dean, with help from Aaron
Volunteer to scribe next week

2: Roll Call

3: Review Agenda

4: Next telecon 15th Nov 2002

5: Minutes of 2002-11-01 telecon


6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions

ACTION: 2002-11-01#7 bwm
review all of primer


ACTION: 2002-11-01#8 Patricks
review datatypes section in primer


ACTION: 2002-11-01#12 bwm
ask JanG about state of testcases wd

7: Concepts Doc
2002-11-01#1   emiller  get editors of concepts to make critical changes and publish

8: Syntax Document
2002-11-01#2  emiller  arrange publication of syntax with DaveB

9: Primer
2002-04-19#16  danbri  review effect of containerMembershipProperty superproperty on primer
2002-05-03#4  em  liase with danbri to ensure primer and schema stay in sync over the isDefinedBy issue
2002-09-13#5  FrankM  update primer to reflect datatype concensus
2002-11-01#3  frankm  Discuss overlap between primer & concepts with 
              concepts editors
2002-11-01#4  daveb  review syntax section of primer      
2002-11-01#5  danbri  review schema section of primer      
2002-11-01#6  stevep  review all of primer      
2002-11-01#7  bwm     review all of primer
2002-11-01#9  patH  look at reification section in primer

Propose publish the primer WD


subject to:

  o critical issues are fixed

  o editor has discretion to fix other issues raised by reviewers



  bwm: 2 critical comments

  PatrickS: 1 critical comment


10: Model Theory
2002-02-25#18  bwm  ensure model theory updated to reflect semantics of 
2002-06-17#4  patH  Update the model theory to specify that rdfs:isDefinedBy 
                    is an rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:seeAlso.
2002-09-13#4  PatH  to update model theory to cover 4 to reflect datatype 

Editors WD:

Need a stable version to review - copied to the archive

Propose publish this WD by 13/Nov/2002 subject to:

  o review by 12/Nov
  o no critical errors not fixed
Call for reviewers.

11: Testcases
2001-10-26-#1 bwm  make a test case to illustrate set/bag decision
2002-02-25#9  JanG  Ensure test cases for rdf:foo added to test cases WD
2002-04-05#5  Jeremy  write test cases for rdfms-xml-literal-namespaces
2002-04-19#14 danc  do entailement test case for container with rdfs:contains
2002-04-19#18 jan  produce test case for rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property
2002-06-07#3  JanG  Fold in the consensus test cases and bring back the rest to the group
2002-06-07#4  JanG  Update the test case problems reported by JeremyC and DaveB
2002-05-31#3  JanG  Update test case document with tests for parseType collection
2002-09-13#6  Jan  create testcase to reflect datatype concensus
2002-09-20#1  jjc  Produce test case domain and range.
2002-10-11#1  janG  add test cases from msg Oct/0098
2002-11-01#11 DanC  Create test cases for non datatyped simple literals
2002-11-01#12  bwm  ask JanG about state of testcases wd

12: Schema
2002-06-17#1  danbri  Update RDFS spec to reflect resolution of 
2002-06-17#5  danbri  Update the schema spec to reflect the resolution of 
2002-06-17#6  danbri  Add to the schema document a comment clarifying the 
                      relationship between the idea that there is exactly one
                      namespace or schema associated with a property and the 
                      rdfs:isDefinedBy property.
2002-06-17#7  danbri  Update the schema spec to account for editorial issues 
                      listed under rdfs-editorial.
2002-06-18#1  danbri  republish the current rdf schema to the current rdf 
                      schema uri
2002-07-12#6  danbri  try to move sec 5 to schema doc
2002-09-13#3  Danbri  update schema to cover 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 5 to reflect
                      datatype concensus
2002-11-01#14  danbri Contact jjc/gk to ask them to review schema draft      
2002-11-01#15  bwm    review schema draft


13: LBase Document
2002-11-01#16  danbri  team contact for publishinging LBase note


Proposed Schedule now on overview page

Comment.  The co-chair(s) would like an agreed plan.

The schedule is clearly tight.  The co-chair(s) are asking for agreement to:

  o we will make best efforts to achieve this plan (as ammended by WG)
  o we will signal as early as possible if this plan is at risk


15: RDF URI Reference The abstract syntax
uses the term RDF URI Reference for absolute URI's with optional
fragment identifiers.  There has been some pushback on using this term
and concerns about how we describe its relationship to URI's.  Where
do we stand on internationalized URI's?

The working principal is that editor of the "natural home" for a
concept names it and defines it.



16: Concepts/Primer overlap
2002-11-01#3  frankm  Discuss overlap between primer & concepts with concepts editors


This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2002 14:31:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:18 UTC