- From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 19:31:20 GMT
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time:
10:00:00 Fri Nov 08 2002 in America/New York
which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Nov 08 2002 in Europe/London
Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore
1: Scribes
This weeks volunteer scribe is Mike Dean, with help from Aaron
Volunteer to scribe next week
2: Roll Call
3: Review Agenda
4: Next telecon 15th Nov 2002
5: Minutes of 2002-11-01 telecon
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0058.html
6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions
ACTION: 2002-11-01#7 bwm
review all of primer
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0148.html
ACTION: 2002-11-01#8 Patricks
review datatypes section in primer
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0069.html
ACTION: 2002-11-01#12 bwm
ask JanG about state of testcases wd
7: Concepts Doc
2002-11-01#1 emiller get editors of concepts to make critical changes and publish
8: Syntax Document
2002-11-01#2 emiller arrange publication of syntax with DaveB
9: Primer
2002-04-19#16 danbri review effect of containerMembershipProperty superproperty on primer
2002-05-03#4 em liase with danbri to ensure primer and schema stay in sync over the isDefinedBy issue
2002-09-13#5 FrankM update primer to reflect datatype concensus
2002-11-01#3 frankm Discuss overlap between primer & concepts with
concepts editors
2002-11-01#4 daveb review syntax section of primer
2002-11-01#5 danbri review schema section of primer
2002-11-01#6 stevep review all of primer
2002-11-01#7 bwm review all of primer
2002-11-01#9 patH look at reification section in primer
Propose publish the primer WD
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0605.html
subject to:
o critical issues are fixed
o editor has discretion to fix other issues raised by reviewers
Reviews:
DanC:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0608.html
bwm: 2 critical comments
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0148.html
PatrickS: 1 critical comment
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0069.html
10: Model Theory
2002-02-25#18 bwm ensure model theory updated to reflect semantics of
rdf:value
2002-06-17#4 patH Update the model theory to specify that rdfs:isDefinedBy
is an rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:seeAlso.
2002-09-13#4 PatH to update model theory to cover 4 to reflect datatype
consensus
Editors WD:
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/RDF%20Model%20Theory_Oct_draft.html
Need a stable version to review - copied to the archive
Propose publish this WD by 13/Nov/2002 subject to:
o review by 12/Nov
o no critical errors not fixed
Call for reviewers.
11: Testcases
2001-10-26-#1 bwm make a test case to illustrate set/bag decision
2002-02-25#9 JanG Ensure test cases for rdf:foo added to test cases WD
2002-04-05#5 Jeremy write test cases for rdfms-xml-literal-namespaces
2002-04-19#14 danc do entailement test case for container with rdfs:contains
2002-04-19#18 jan produce test case for rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property
2002-06-07#3 JanG Fold in the consensus test cases and bring back the rest to the group
2002-06-07#4 JanG Update the test case problems reported by JeremyC and DaveB
2002-05-31#3 JanG Update test case document with tests for parseType collection
2002-09-13#6 Jan create testcase to reflect datatype concensus
2002-09-20#1 jjc Produce test case domain and range.
2002-10-11#1 janG add test cases from msg Oct/0098
2002-11-01#11 DanC Create test cases for non datatyped simple literals
2002-11-01#12 bwm ask JanG about state of testcases wd
12: Schema
2002-06-17#1 danbri Update RDFS spec to reflect resolution of
rdfms-seq-representation
2002-06-17#5 danbri Update the schema spec to reflect the resolution of
rdfs-isDefinedBy.
2002-06-17#6 danbri Add to the schema document a comment clarifying the
relationship between the idea that there is exactly one
namespace or schema associated with a property and the
rdfs:isDefinedBy property.
2002-06-17#7 danbri Update the schema spec to account for editorial issues
listed under rdfs-editorial.
2002-06-18#1 danbri republish the current rdf schema to the current rdf
schema uri
2002-07-12#6 danbri try to move sec 5 to schema doc
2002-09-13#3 Danbri update schema to cover 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 5 to reflect
datatype concensus
2002-11-01#14 danbri Contact jjc/gk to ask them to review schema draft
2002-11-01#15 bwm review schema draft
Status/schedule:
Needs:
Issuettes:
13: LBase Document
2002-11-01#16 danbri team contact for publishinging LBase note
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Oct/0046.html
14:
Proposed Schedule now on overview page
Comment. The co-chair(s) would like an agreed plan.
The schedule is clearly tight. The co-chair(s) are asking for agreement to:
o we will make best efforts to achieve this plan (as ammended by WG)
o we will signal as early as possible if this plan is at risk
See:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/#microschedule
15: RDF URI Reference The abstract syntax
uses the term RDF URI Reference for absolute URI's with optional
fragment identifiers. There has been some pushback on using this term
and concerns about how we describe its relationship to URI's. Where
do we stand on internationalized URI's?
The working principal is that editor of the "natural home" for a
concept names it and defines it.
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0088.html
16: Concepts/Primer overlap
2002-11-01#3 frankm Discuss overlap between primer & concepts with concepts editors
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0088.html
------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2002 14:31:31 UTC