- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 13:41:12 +0000
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 18:50 06/11/2002 -0600, pat hayes wrote: [...] >Add some datatypes: > >If sss is a legal lexical form for ddd then > >aaa ppp "sss"^^ddd . >ddd a rdfs:Datatype . >--> >aaa ppp -:xxx . >_:xxx a ddd . Are there technical reasons why sss has to be legal for this entailment. Would it make sense that just be using ddd in that position in a literal, one is asserting that its a datatype. Of course one, might be wrong; but that's not RDF's business. Brian
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2002 08:38:51 UTC