Re: RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty?

• From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
• Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:00:17 -0500 (EST)
• To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
• cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0211081959360.10783-100000@tux.w3.org>

OK, let's consider this closed. Everyone seems agreed on 'no'.

I'll update RDFS spec accordingly.

Dan


On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>
> >is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty?
>
> no.
>
> The rdf:_NN are bastards and having a clean way (not URI inspection) of
> distinguishing them from more honest born properties is a high want.
>
>
> Thus
>
> xxx rdf:type rdfs:ContainerMemberShipProperty .
>
> iff
>
> xxx has a uri being the concatenation of rdf:_ and a positive integer in
> canonical form
>
> (does anyones code flag rdf:_007 as not an expected rdf property?)
>
>
> Jeremy
>

Received on Friday, 8 November 2002 20:00:18 UTC