- From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 21:02:11 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Well, I'd hope nobody's referencing that one because it's been flagged as "due for the chop" for some time now. In this case, I think it should probably go (with suitable warning to the other authors, of course)... publication checks will pick up any obsolete references, which, if they exist, should probably be removed. Brian, the answer to your later question is the first paragraph above. The corresponding material is being removed. I think Jeremy has picked up a genuine exception to the eminently sensible general rule you have established concerning anchors. If this has a knock-on effect on other documents, we have to deal with that. #g -- At 05:57 PM 11/21/02 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > 5.1 Character normalization > > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#xtocid48034 > >character normalization has gone as promised. > >hence this link is conceptually broken. > >Any suggestions? > >Jeremy ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2002 16:33:56 UTC