W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Feedback request

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 19:24:38 +0000
Message-Id: <>
To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

At 10:47 AM 11/1/02 -0600, pat hayes wrote:
>>>4. (RDFS)
>>>rdfs:Literal rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Resource .
>So? Nothing up my sleeve. Do you want to make sure that this is not an 
>entailment? I could, but I guess I was suggesting that there was no longer 
>any point in being so persnickety. But OK, I'll go on being persnickety if 
>you want me to. This amounts to allowing for the semantic possibility of 
>there being literal values that cannot be denoted by any URI or any RDF 
>literal. Which seems kind of, well, pendantic.

I'm not sure I'd want to go there (i.e. having some value that cannot be 
denoted by a URI).


Graham Klyne
Received on Friday, 1 November 2002 14:35:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:18 UTC