- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 19:24:38 +0000
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 10:47 AM 11/1/02 -0600, pat hayes wrote: >>>4. (RDFS) >>>rdfs:Literal rdfs:subClassOf rdf:Resource . >> >>Ha! > >So? Nothing up my sleeve. Do you want to make sure that this is not an >entailment? I could, but I guess I was suggesting that there was no longer >any point in being so persnickety. But OK, I'll go on being persnickety if >you want me to. This amounts to allowing for the semantic possibility of >there being literal values that cannot be denoted by any URI or any RDF >literal. Which seems kind of, well, pendantic. I'm not sure I'd want to go there (i.e. having some value that cannot be denoted by a URI). #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Friday, 1 November 2002 14:35:49 UTC