- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 11:56:23 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>>>Jeremy Carroll said:
>
> (neither are *critical* both substantive)
> Suggestions:
>
> 3.1
> character defn changes 127 to 126
That was a bug, the hexadecimal was correct (#x20-#x7E), the comment
was wrong ("... to 127")
Fixed.
> langguage defn
> in concepts language is now lower case.
> This is a cross-document consistency issue.
Can you give me a pointer to this? I thought this was being done at
the semantic level, not in the syntaxes?
> Options:
> do nothing, resolve later.
> or
> new text:
>
> language ::= [a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]+
>
> (delete ref to REC-xml#sec-lang-tag)
Why? I guess this is incomplete since it is refering obliquely to
multiple changing RFCs. Is checking this unimportant? Is it defined
elsewhere that is better pointed at?
If I used the above defn, it would be good to explain where it came
from.
Dave
Received on Monday, 11 November 2002 06:57:42 UTC