- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 14:39:07 +0000
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, pfps@research.bell-labs.com
I agree, and shudder somewhat to think where we end up if we have things that can be denoted by literals that cannot be denoted by URIrefs. #g -- At 11:05 PM 11/8/02 -0600, pat hayes wrote: >> > rdf:object rdfs:range rdfs:Resource . * >> >>...did we agree that all literals are resources? > >Well, I asked the WG if they approved of the general entailment patterns like > >aaa ppp <some literal> . >--> >aaa ppp _:xxx . > >and they did; and these are valid only if literals are resources. So, I'm >assuming that we did agree that. If not, then please re-think those >entailments, guys. > >Pat > > >-- >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >IHMC (850)434 8903 home >40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office >Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax >FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell >phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes >s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Saturday, 9 November 2002 09:57:16 UTC