- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 27 Nov 2002 09:07:47 -0600
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>, RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 08:55, Brian McBride wrote: > > I just peeked into the list after a couple of days of working on other > stuff and this was the first message I saw. I am responding to it without > having seen other recent traffic. > > Have we not discussed different ways of doing datatyping enough? No. We have discussed it more than I would have liked, but not enough to air all the relevant issues. I have seen new information since these decisions 11Oct (items 7 and 8) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0131.html 6Sep (item 10) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0081.html and now that you have asked the WG, yes, I support re-opening them. I think the decisions we've taken will do more harm than good. > The issues that Graham addresses here are closed. I hope the WG will have > the self discipline to recognise that, and that this will be the only > response on the list to Graham's post. Well, I'm confused. You could have just said "this issue is closed; stop talking about it on this list." But you didn't; you asked whether we should reopen it; my opinion is that we should, so I can't just not reply. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2002 10:08:46 UTC