public-tracking@w3.org from February 2012 by date

Wednesday, 29 February 2012

• Re: Third parties should not pretend to be first parties Roy T. Fielding
• some information on what HTML5 uses 'user interaction' for David Singer
• Third parties should not pretend to be first parties Tom Lowenthal
• RE: Initial feedback on the well-known URI Proposal Kevin Smith
• Re: JS Exception API Roy T. Fielding
• Re: JS Exception API Nicholas Doty
• Re: JS Exception API Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data Tom Lowenthal
• Re: Action-101; language for issue-6 for TCS spec John Simpson
• Re: Initial feedback on the well-known URI Proposal Roy T. Fielding
• Re: JS Exception API Roy T. Fielding
• JS Exception API Tom Lowenthal
• Action-91: Write text on fingerprinting risk (ISSUE-109, ISSUE-114), with Nick Doty Andy Zeigler
• Re: ACTION-130 Call for use cases Kevin Trilli
• Re: Action-101; language for issue-6 for TCS spec Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: Agenda for 2012-Feb-29 call Matthias Schunter
• Initial feedback on the well-known URI Proposal Matthias Schunter
• RE: Action-101; language for issue-6 for TCS spec Shane Wiley
• Re: Action-101; language for issue-6 for TCS spec John Simpson
• Agenda for 2012-Feb-29 call Aleecia M. McDonald

Tuesday, 28 February 2012

• DNT mobile Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Thomas Roessler
• Re: The DAA Commitment Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: Issue-107, Issue-120, Issue-124 Roy T. Fielding
• Re: The DAA Commitment Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Issue-107, Issue-120, Issue-124 Nicholas Doty
• Re: Issue-107, Issue-120, Issue-124 Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Issue-107, Issue-120, Issue-124 John Simpson
• Re: Issue-107, Issue-120, Issue-124 David Singer
• Issue-107, Issue-120, Issue-124 John Simpson
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Roy T. Fielding

Monday, 27 February 2012

• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Karl Dubost
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Karl Dubost
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Karl Dubost
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Lauren Gelman
• Re: The DAA Commitment Jonathan Mayer

Sunday, 26 February 2012

• RE: DNT ad tag integration JC Cannon
• RE: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 JC Cannon
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Jeffrey Chester

Saturday, 25 February 2012

• Re: The DAA Commitment Ed Felten
• Re: The DAA Commitment Mike Zaneis
• ACTION-133 collect comparison criteria Roy T. Fielding
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 JC Cannon

Friday, 24 February 2012

• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 David Singer
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 JC Cannon
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 David Singer
• Re: The DAA Commitment John Simpson
• Re: who are we protecting against? is it 'bad actors'? John Simpson
• Re: The DAA Commitment Karl Dubost
• The DAA Commitment Mike Zaneis
• RE: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 JC Cannon
• DAA and add browser-based header signals Karl Dubost
• Re: Action-101: Revise text for Issue-6, What are the underlying concerns? Haakon Bratsberg
• Re: ACTION-130 Call for use cases Matthias Schunter
• Re: White House event Ed Felten
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Karl Dubost
• Re: who are we protecting against? is it 'bad actors'? Karl Dubost
• Re: who are we protecting against? is it 'bad actors'? Jonathan Mayer
• who are we protecting against? is it 'bad actors'? David Singer

Thursday, 23 February 2012

• RE: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Kevin Smith
• Re: DNT ad tag integration Rob van Eijk
• Re: Action-99, Write up automated discoverability of party relationships proposal; also action-80 David Singer
• Re: Action-101: Revise text for Issue-6, What are the underlying concerns? Rigo Wenning
• Re: DNT ad tag integration Jonathan Mayer
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Karl Dubost
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Karl Dubost
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Karl Dubost
• DNT ad tag integration Travis Pinnick
• Re: ACTION-98: Bring input on ISSUE-111 to the group; otherwise it's closed Karl Dubost
• Re: Action-101: Revise text for Issue-6, What are the underlying concerns? Rigo Wenning
• Re: [comment] Names and Titles of specifications Karl Dubost
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Karl Dubost
• Re: Action-99, Write up automated discoverability of party relationships proposal; also action-80 Karl Dubost
• Re: Action-101: Revise text for Issue-6, What are the underlying concerns? Karl Dubost
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Karl Dubost
• ACTION-130 Call for use cases Matthias Schunter
• RE: DAA Statement on DNT ("Broswer [sic] Based Choice Mechanism") Shane Wiley
• Re: DAA Statement on DNT ("Broswer [sic] Based Choice Mechanism") Geoff Gieron - AdTruth
• Re: DAA Statement on DNT ("Broswer [sic] Based Choice Mechanism") Geoff Gieron - AdTruth
• Re: DAA Statement on DNT ("Broswer [sic] Based Choice Mechanism") Jonathan Mayer

Wednesday, 22 February 2012

• Re: Action 93 Tamir Israel

Thursday, 23 February 2012

• White House event Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: DAA Statement on DNT ("Broswer [sic] Based Choice Mechanism") Jeffrey Chester
• DAA Statement on DNT ("Broswer [sic] Based Choice Mechanism") Jonathan Mayer
• Re: possible 'transient un-analyzed data exception'? David Singer
• Re: ACTION 124 John Simpson
• Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) John Simpson
• RE: possible 'transient un-analyzed data exception'? Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION 124 Chris Pedigo
• possible 'transient un-analyzed data exception'? David Singer
• RE: ACTION 124 Shane Wiley
• RE: Action-101; language for issue-6 for TCS spec Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION 124 Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Action-101; language for issue-6 for TCS spec David Singer
• Re: ACTION-52: Propose specific text for ISSUE-35, ISSUE-52, ISSUE-53, ISSUE-57, ISSUE-58 David Singer
• Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) David Singer

Wednesday, 22 February 2012

• Re: ACTION 124 Lee Tien
• RE: ACTION 124 JC Cannon
• RE: ACTION 124 Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION 124 Lee Tien
• tracking-ISSUE-127: Comparison of well-known URI and response headers: Pro's and Con's of both? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: ACTION 124 Shane Wiley
• Re: Action 93 Jeffrey Chester
• RE: Action 93 JC Cannon
• Re: ACTION-115: Write up counter-proposal to header with well-known URI Rigo Wenning
• Re: ACTION 124 Jeffrey Chester
• RE: ACTION 124 Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION 124 Jeffrey Chester
• RE: ACTION 124 Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION 124 Jeffrey Chester
• Re: Action 93 Alan Chapell
• Action 93 Jeffrey Chester
• Re: ACTION 124 Rigo Wenning
• Re: ACTION 124 Kimon Zorbas
• Re: ACTION 124 Rigo Wenning
• Re: ACTION 124 Kimon Zorbas
• Re: ACTION 124 Jeffrey Chester
• Re: ACTION 124 Kimon Zorbas
• Re: ACTION 124 Kimon Zorbas
• Re: ACTION 124 Rigo Wenning
• Re: ACTION-98: Bring input on ISSUE-111 to the group; otherwise it's closed Nicholas Doty
• RE: ACTION-98: Bring input on ISSUE-111 to the group; otherwise it's closed Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION-98: Bring input on ISSUE-111 to the group; otherwise it's closed Nicholas Doty
• Re: Issue 25: Possible exemption for research purposes covered by conditions for outsourcing and issue 34: Exemption for aggregated data Nicholas Doty
• Re: ACTION 124 Nicholas Doty
• Action-101; language for issue-6 for TCS spec John Simpson
• RE: ACTION 124 Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION 124 John Simpson
• RE: ACTION 124 Amy Colando (LCA)
• Re: ACTION 124 John Simpson
• ACTION 124 Amy Colando (LCA)

Tuesday, 21 February 2012

• RE: RE: FW: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Matthias Schunter
• PENDING REVIEW: Proposal to close a series of PENDING REVIEW Items Matthias Schunter
• RE: Issue 25: Possible exemption for research purposes covered by conditions for outsourcing and issue 34: Exemption for aggregated data Deliyannis, Alexandros
• Agenda for 2012-Feb-22 call Matthias Schunter

Monday, 20 February 2012

• Re: tracking-ISSUE-126: DNT-extension syntax includes characters not safe to embed in JSON [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Roy T. Fielding
• Re: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85) Matthias Schunter
• Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Rigo Wenning
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-126: DNT-extension syntax includes characters not safe to embed in JSON [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Matthias Schunter

Sunday, 19 February 2012

• Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Geoff Gieron - AdTruth
• RE: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) JC Cannon
• Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Jeffrey Chester
• RE: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) rigo@w3.org
• RE: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Jules Polonetsky

Saturday, 18 February 2012

• Re: ACTION-52: Propose specific text for ISSUE-35, ISSUE-52, ISSUE-53, ISSUE-57, ISSUE-58 Rigo Wenning
• Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Rigo Wenning

Thursday, 16 February 2012

• Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Roy T. Fielding
• RE: Agenda for 2012-Feb-14 call JC Cannon
• RE: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Kevin Smith
• RE: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Amy Colando (LCA)
• Re: ACTION-52: Propose specific text for ISSUE-35, ISSUE-52, ISSUE-53, ISSUE-57, ISSUE-58 Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) John Simpson
• Agenda for 2012-Feb-14 call Aleecia M. McDonald
• RE: [Action-106][Issue-32] Sharing of data between entities via cookie syncing / identity brokering TOUBIANA, VINCENT (VINCENT)
• Re: [comment] Names and Titles of specifications Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: Issue-65: How does logged in and logged out state work -- Draft Proposal Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: [Action-106][Issue-32] Sharing of data between entities via cookie syncing / identity brokering Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: [Action-106][Issue-32] Sharing of data between entities via cookie syncing / identity brokering Sean Harvey
• RE: ACTION-52: Propose specific text for ISSUE-35, ISSUE-52, ISSUE-53, ISSUE-57, ISSUE-58 Shane Wiley
• Re: [Action-106][Issue-32] Sharing of data between entities via cookie syncing / identity brokering Sean Harvey
• Re: ACTION-52: Propose specific text for ISSUE-35, ISSUE-52, ISSUE-53, ISSUE-57, ISSUE-58 Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: [Action-106][Issue-32] Sharing of data between entities via cookie syncing / identity brokering Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: ACTION-122, ISSUE-125: Pro-actively requesting exceptions Roy T. Fielding

Wednesday, 15 February 2012

• tracking-ISSUE-126: DNT-extension syntax includes characters not safe to embed in JSON [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Kevin Smith
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Lauren Gelman
• RE: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Kevin Smith
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Kevin Smith
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 TOUBIANA, VINCENT (VINCENT)
• Minutes, minutes, every where Nicholas Doty
• ACTION-122, ISSUE-125: Pro-actively requesting exceptions Nicholas Doty
• Action-99, Write up automated discoverability of party relationships proposal; also action-80 David Singer
• Action-99, Write up automated discoverability of party relationships proposal; also action-80 David Singer

Tuesday, 14 February 2012

• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Haakon Bratsberg
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Shane Wiley
• Re: Action-101: Revise text for Issue-6, What are the underlying concerns? Rigo Wenning
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Vincent Toubiana
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jeffrey Chester
• RE: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Kathy Joe
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Kathy Joe
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Aleecia M. McDonald
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 JC Cannon
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Shane Wiley
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 TOUBIANA, VINCENT (VINCENT)
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 TOUBIANA, VINCENT (VINCENT)
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 JC Cannon
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Shane Wiley
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 TOUBIANA, VINCENT (VINCENT)
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Jeffrey Chester
• RE: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Chris Pedigo
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Chris Pedigo
• RE: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Chris Pedigo
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 TOUBIANA, VINCENT (VINCENT)
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Thomas Roessler
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Alan Chapell
• Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Nicholas Doty
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Shane Wiley
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 JC Cannon
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Jonathan Mayer
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 JC Cannon
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Jonathan Mayer
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 JC Cannon
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 JC Cannon
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Jonathan Mayer
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Shane Wiley

Monday, 13 February 2012

• Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Roy T. Fielding
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 JC Cannon
• Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Nicholas Doty
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Jonathan Robert Mayer
• Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Roy T. Fielding
• RE: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Mike Zaneis
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Jeffrey Chester
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 JC Cannon
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Jonathan Mayer
• RE: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Mike Zaneis
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 JC Cannon
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Jonathan Mayer
• Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Nicholas Doty
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Jonathan Mayer
• DC face-to-face: poll closing tomorrow Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Jeffrey Chester
• Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Alan Chapell
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Alan Chapell
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 John Simpson
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Jeffrey Chester
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Alan Chapell
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 John Simpson
• Re: Issue 25: Possible exemption for research purposes covered by conditions for outsourcing and issue 34: Exemption for aggregated data Nicholas Doty
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Alan Chapell
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 JC Cannon
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 JC Cannon
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) JC Cannon
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 John Simpson
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Geoff Gieron - AdTruth
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Lauren Gelman
• Re: Action-101: Revise text for Issue-6, What are the underlying concerns? John Simpson
• RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track TOUBIANA, VINCENT (VINCENT)
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 JC Cannon
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Jeffrey Chester
• RE: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Ninja Marnau
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 JC Cannon
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Lee Tien
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Alan Chapell
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Jeffrey Chester
• RE: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Amy Colando (LCA)
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Alan Chapell
• RE: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Shane Wiley
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Lee Tien
• ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119) Ninja Marnau
• Re: [Issue-5][Action-78] Remember to forget me Karl Dubost
• RE: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Amy Colando (LCA)
• Re: Action-101: Revise text for Issue-6, What are the underlying concerns? Jeffrey Chester
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Alan Chapell
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Jeffrey Chester
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Jeffrey Chester
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jeffrey Chester
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Kathy Joe
• RE: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 Kathy Joe
• revised text for ISSUE-78 Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ACTION-115: Write up counter-proposal to header with well-known URI Roy T. Fielding
• Re: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84) Nicholas Doty
• Issue-10 housekeeping (was Re: technical, business, legal definitions) Aleecia M. McDonald
• RE: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85, ACTION-111) JC Cannon

Sunday, 12 February 2012

• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• RE: ACTION-52: Propose specific text for ISSUE-35, ISSUE-52, ISSUE-53, ISSUE-57, ISSUE-58 Shane Wiley
• RE: ACTION-52: Propose specific text for ISSUE-35, ISSUE-52, ISSUE-53, ISSUE-57, ISSUE-58 JC Cannon
• RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track JC Cannon
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 JC Cannon
• RE: [Action-106][Issue-32] Sharing of data between entities via cookie syncing / identity brokering Shane Wiley
• RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Shane Wiley
• RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Rob van Eijk
• RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Shane Wiley
• RE: [Issue-5][Action-78] Remember to forget me Shane Wiley
• RE: [Issue-71] Proposed Text for Issue 71 Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Rob van Eijk
• RE: [Issue-5][Action-78] Remember to forget me JC Cannon
• Re: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Vincent Toubiana
• Re: [ACTION-48] Re-phrase 3.6.1.2.1 Rob van Eijk
• Re: [Action-106][Issue-32] Sharing of data between entities via cookie syncing / identity brokering Rob van Eijk
• Re: Action-101: Revise text for Issue-6, What are the underlying concerns? Nicholas Doty
• Re: [Issue-71] Proposed Text for Issue 71 Nicholas Doty

Saturday, 11 February 2012

• Re: Action-101: Revise text for Issue-6, What are the underlying concerns? Rigo Wenning

Friday, 10 February 2012

• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Marc Groman

Thursday, 9 February 2012

• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices Geoff Gieron - AdTruth

Friday, 10 February 2012

• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Geoff Gieron - AdTruth
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Geoff Gieron - AdTruth

Saturday, 11 February 2012

• Re: Advancing the W3C's Overall Agenda Jeffrey Chester
• ACTION-115: Write up counter-proposal to header with well-known URI Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Advancing the W3C's Overall Agenda John Simpson
• Re: Advancing the W3C's Overall Agenda David Singer

Friday, 10 February 2012

• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices Jeffrey Chester
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Justin Brookman
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices Alan Chapell
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Peter Eckersley
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Peter Eckersley
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) John Simpson
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Lauren Gelman
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Justin Brookman
• Browser Implementation of DNT: Opera Karl Dubost
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Peter Eckersley
• Re: ISSUE-121 Re: ACTION-84: Wiley to describe the reason for setting DNT=null Karl Dubost
• Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data Karl Dubost
• RE: ISSUE-121 Re: ACTION-84: Wiley to describe the reason for setting DNT=null Shane Wiley
• ISSUE-121 Re: ACTION-84: Wiley to describe the reason for setting DNT=null Karl Dubost
• Re: [Issue-5][Action-78] Remember to forget me Karl Dubost
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Mayer
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Matthias Schunter
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• RE: Advancing the W3C's Overall Agenda Adrian Bateman
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Mayer
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Mike Zaneis
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Robert Mayer
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Mayer
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Amy Colando (LCA)
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Peter Eckersley
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Advancing the W3C's Overall Agenda Thomas Roessler
• Re: Advancing the W3C's Overall Agenda Matthias Schunter
• Re: Advancing the W3C's Overall Agenda Mike Zaneis
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Ed Felten
• Re: Advancing the W3C's Overall Agenda Matthias Schunter
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Justin Brookman
• RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Shane Wiley
• Re: Advancing the W3C's Overall Agenda John Simpson
• Advancing the W3C's Overall Agenda Mike Zaneis
• Re: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Lee Tien

Thursday, 9 February 2012

• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Matthias Schunter
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Lauren Gelman
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Kevin Smith
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Justin Brookman
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jeffrey Chester
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Matthias Schunter
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Roy T. Fielding
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Kevin Smith
• RE: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' Shane Wiley
• RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Shane Wiley
• RE: [Issue-71] Proposed Text for Issue 71 Shane Wiley
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' David Singer
• Re: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track John Simpson
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices Jeffrey Chester
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Kevin Smith
• Re: [Issue-71] Proposed Text for Issue 71 David Singer
• Re: [Issue-71] Proposed Text for Issue 71 Lauren Gelman
• RE: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices Kevin Smith
• Re: [Issue-71] Proposed Text for Issue 71 David Singer
• RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Rigo Wenning
• Re: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85, ACTION-111) Thomas Roessler
• RE: [Issue-71] Proposed Text for Issue 71 JC Cannon
• RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Shane Wiley
• RE: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85, ACTION-111) JC Cannon
• Re: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Rigo Wenning
• RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Rigo Wenning
• Re: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85, ACTION-111) Thomas Roessler
• RE: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. Sean Harvey
• RE: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. Matthias Schunter
• Re: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. Matthias Schunter
• Re: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. Sean Harvey
• Re: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. Matthias Schunter
• Re: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. Sean Harvey
• Re: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. Matthias Schunter
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Rigo Wenning
• RE: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' Shane Wiley
• RE: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' Shane Wiley
• RE: [Issue-71] Proposed Text for Issue 71 Shane Wiley
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: [Issue-71] Proposed Text for Issue 71 Lauren Gelman
• RE: [Issue-71] Proposed Text for Issue 71 Kevin Smith
• Re: [Issue-71] Proposed Text for Issue 71 David Singer
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices Jeffrey Chester
• RE: [Issue-71] Proposed Text for Issue 71 JC Cannon
• Re: [Issue-71] Proposed Text for Issue 71 David Singer
• RE: [Issue-71] Proposed Text for Issue 71 JC Cannon

Wednesday, 8 February 2012

• RE: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices Jules Polonetsky
• Re: [Issue-71] Proposed Text for Issue 71 David Singer
• Re: Housekeeping from today's call Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Matthias Schunter
• Re: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' Rigo Wenning
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices Alan Chapell

Tuesday, 7 February 2012

• Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data Lauren Gelman

Wednesday, 8 February 2012

• Re: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) David Singer
• Re: Housekeeping from today's call Alan Chapell

Tuesday, 7 February 2012

• Re: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) Lauren Gelman

Wednesday, 8 February 2012

• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices Jeffrey Chester
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Rigo Wenning
• Housekeeping from today's call Aleecia M. McDonald
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices Alan Chapell
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Rigo Wenning
• RE: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices Shane Wiley
• tracking-ISSUE-125: Way to test if a given user agent supports DNT [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 7 February 2012

• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) JC Cannon
• RE: [Issue-71] Proposed Text for Issue 71 JC Cannon

Wednesday, 8 February 2012

• Issue 115, exemptions, best practices Jeffrey Chester
• Re: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) Rigo Wenning
• Re: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. Kevin Trilli
• Re: New Research on Protocol Information (ISSUE-16, ISSUE-19) John Simpson

Tuesday, 7 February 2012

• RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Amy Colando (LCA)

Wednesday, 8 February 2012

• Re: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) John Simpson

Tuesday, 7 February 2012

• RE: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85, ACTION-111) JC Cannon

Wednesday, 8 February 2012

• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 John Simpson
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 John Simpson
• RE: [ACTION-48] Re-phrase 3.6.1.2.1 Amy Colando (LCA)

Tuesday, 7 February 2012

• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 JC Cannon
• Re: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' Lauren Gelman

Wednesday, 8 February 2012

• Re: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) Roy T. Fielding
• RE: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' Shane Wiley
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• Re: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' Rigo Wenning
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Rigo Wenning
• [Action-40] Draft user defn language Ninja Marnau
• Re: New Research on Protocol Information (ISSUE-16, ISSUE-19) Matthias Schunter
• Re: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) David Singer
• Re: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) David Singer
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Jeffrey Chester
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Jonathan Robert Mayer
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Ninja Marnau
• Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data, Action-67 Justin Brookman
• Re: multi-stakeholder participation (was Re: Deciding Exceptions....) Alan Chapell
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Alan Chapell
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Justin Brookman
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• RE: New Research on Protocol Information (ISSUE-16, ISSUE-19) Shane Wiley
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION-86: Write a clarification of dnt:c to apply to never-tracked resources Rigo Wenning
• Re: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) Rigo Wenning
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Rigo Wenning
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Rigo Wenning
• [Action-106][Issue-32] Sharing of data between entities via cookie syncing / identity brokering TOUBIANA, VINCENT (VINCENT)

Tuesday, 7 February 2012

• Re: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) Lauren Gelman

Wednesday, 8 February 2012

• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Rigo Wenning
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Rigo Wenning
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Rigo Wenning
• Re: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. Sean Harvey
• Re: New Research on Protocol Information (ISSUE-16, ISSUE-19) Rigo Wenning
• RE: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) Shane Wiley
• Re: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) Lauren Gelman
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• ACTION-95, ISSUE-118: asynchronous version of site-specific exception API Nicholas Doty
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ACTION-86: Write a clarification of dnt:c to apply to never-tracked resources Nicholas Doty
• New Research on Protocol Information (ISSUE-16, ISSUE-19) Jonathan Mayer

Tuesday, 7 February 2012

• Re: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Jonathan Mayer
• Re: [Issue-71] Proposed Text for Issue 71 Jonathan Mayer
• Re: multi-stakeholder participation (was Re: Deciding Exceptions....) Nicholas Doty
• Re: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85, ACTION-111) Jonathan Robert Mayer
• RE: ISSUE-106: Responses on cached objects Shane Wiley
• RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track JC Cannon
• Re: Agenda for 2012-Feb-8 call David Singer
• Re: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) David Singer
• Re: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85, ACTION-111) Matthias Schunter
• Re: [Issue-71] Proposed Text for Issue 71 Ninja Marnau
• ISSUE-106: Responses on cached objects Matthias Schunter
• Re: ACTION-86: Write a clarification of dnt:c to apply to never-tracked resources Matthias Schunter
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Alan Chapell
• Agenda for 2012-Feb-8 call Aleecia M. McDonald
• RE: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) Shane Wiley
• RE: Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text) Shane Wiley
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Ed Felten
• Re: Action-101: Revise text for Issue-6, What are the underlying concerns? John Simpson
• Next f2f meeting: Doodle poll Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: Action-101: Revise text for Issue-6, What are the underlying concerns? David Wainberg

Monday, 6 February 2012

• Issue-5 - Cross Tracking Definition Proposal Kevin Smith
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Mike Zaneis
• Re: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. Matthias Schunter
• Re: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 David Wainberg
• Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data David Wainberg
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) David Wainberg
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Sean Harvey
• tracking-ISSUE-124: Alternative DNT implementations that replace HTTP headers with something else [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: DNT Compliance and Audit Services (ACTION-56, ISSUE-21) JC Cannon
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jeffrey Chester
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jeffrey Chester
• Issue 74: Are surveys out of scope & Issue 34: Exemption for aggregated data Kathy Joe
• Issue 25: Possible exemption for research purposes covered by conditions for outsourcing and issue 34: Exemption for aggregated data Kathy Joe
• RE: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data Shane Wiley
• RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Shane Wiley
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• RE: ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Shane Wiley
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Alan Chapell
• Re: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. Nicholas Doty
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Roy T. Fielding

Sunday, 5 February 2012

• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Mayer
• ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54 Sean Harvey
• Re: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. Sean Harvey
• Re: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. Sean Harvey
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Sean Harvey
• Action 74, Do Not Create A Profile Jeffrey Chester
• Re: [Issue-5][Action-78] Remember to forget me Vincent Toubiana
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jeffrey Chester
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Bryan Sullivan

Saturday, 4 February 2012

• issue-122 Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Bryan Sullivan
• Re: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' Bryan Sullivan
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Mayer

Friday, 3 February 2012

• Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data Tom Lowenthal
• ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. Tom Lowenthal
• Re: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Nicholas Doty
• [ACTION-48] Re-phrase 3.6.1.2.1 Rigo Wenning
• RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Shane Wiley
• Re: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) Tom Lowenthal
• Re: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Nicholas Doty
• Re: DNT Compliance and Audit Services (ACTION-56, ISSUE-21) Tom Lowenthal
• Re: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ACTION-44: Also write additional examples around branding for first parties by next week Tom Lowenthal
• EU regulators want Google to halt new privacy policy | Firstpost Karl Dubost
• Re: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' David Singer
• Re: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' Roy T. Fielding
• Re: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' Roy T. Fielding
• RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track JC Cannon
• RE: [Issue-5][Action-78] Remember to forget me JC Cannon
• Re: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' Lauren Gelman
• Re: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' Roy T. Fielding

Thursday, 2 February 2012

• Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Shane Wiley
• Re: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' Lauren Gelman
• Action-101: Revise text for Issue-6, What are the underlying concerns? John Simpson
• ACTION 100: machine readable lists Amy, Joanne and Kevin Amy Colando (LCA)
• Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) John Simpson
• [Issue-5][Action-78] Remember to forget me Vincent Toubiana
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Alan Chapell
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Alan Chapell
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Matthias Schunter
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jeffrey Chester
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jeffrey Chester
• Re: ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are Jeffrey Chester
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Shane Wiley
• Re: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' David Singer
• Re: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' David Singer
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Lauren Gelman
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Bryan Sullivan
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Lauren Gelman
• Re: ISSUE-33, ACTION-59: exemptions exposed to users Bryan Sullivan
• Re: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' Bryan Sullivan
• Re: ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are Bryan Sullivan
• Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Bryan Sullivan
• Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) Jonathan Mayer
• RE: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Amy Colando (LCA)
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-121: Should a user agent advertise its DNT ability by, e.g., sending DNT;NULL [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Shane Wiley
• RE: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) Shane Wiley
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-121: Should a user agent advertise its DNT ability by, e.g., sending DNT;NULL [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Nicholas Doty
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-121: Should a user agent advertise its DNT ability by, e.g., sending DNT;NULL [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Shane Wiley
• RE: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85, ACTION-111) Shane Wiley
• RE: ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are Shane Wiley
• RE: ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are Lauren Gelman
• RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track Shane Wiley
• RE: ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are Shane Wiley
• RE: ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are Shane Wiley
• RE: ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are Lauren Gelman

Wednesday, 1 February 2012

• RE: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) Shane Wiley
• Re: [Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track' John Simpson
• Re: ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are Jeffrey Chester
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-121: Should a user agent advertise its DNT ability by, e.g., sending DNT;NULL [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] John Simpson
• Re: ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are John Simpson
• Re: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) John Simpson
• Re: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) John Simpson
• Re: Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28) John Simpson
• Re: ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are John Simpson
• Re: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track John Simpson
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-121: Should a user agent advertise its DNT ability by, e.g., sending DNT;NULL [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Kevin Smith
• RE: ACTION-84: Wiley to describe the reason for setting DNT=null Kevin Smith
• tracking-ISSUE-123: Third parties should be prohibited from acting or representing themselves as first parties. [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
• tracking-ISSUE-122: Should we have use limitations on referrer data? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
• ACTION-86: Write a clarification of dnt:c to apply to never-tracked resources Nicholas Doty
• Re: DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85, ACTION-111) Thomas Roessler
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-121: Should a user agent advertise its DNT ability by, e.g., sending DNT;NULL [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Nicholas Doty
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-121: Should a user agent advertise its DNT ability by, e.g., sending DNT;NULL [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Shane Wiley
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-121: Should a user agent advertise its DNT ability by, e.g., sending DNT;NULL [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Nicholas Doty
• RE: ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are Shane Wiley
• Re: ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are David Singer
• RE: ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are TOUBIANA, VINCENT (VINCENT)
• RE: DNT Compliance and Audit Services (ACTION-56, ISSUE-21) Shane Wiley
• Re: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36) Tom Lowenthal
• ACTION-61 ISSUE-45 Tom Lowenthal
• DNT Compliance and Audit Services (ACTION-56, ISSUE-21) Kevin Trilli

Last message date: Wednesday, 29 February 2012 23:51:39 UTC