- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:03:19 +0100
- To: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Aleecia M. McDonald <aleecia@aleecia.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org Group WG" <public-tracking@w3.org>
On 2012-02-28, at 04:00 +0100, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >> Yet I fear I'm not seeing your point. How is kiddie porn linked to DNT? Are you imagining someone would enable DNT but not TOR? I'm not getting the relevance to your anecdote. > > That's because Karl quoted me out of context. I was talking about > why companies don't provide a market in anonymization services > that would allow people on the Internet to buy using the equivalent > of cash. Liability risks is why. It has nothing to do with DNT, > nor is it FUD. I think the operative part of the paragraph is "it has nothing to do with DNT". May I suggest we move this particular piece of the conversation over to public-privacy@w3.org? Thanks!
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 12:03:25 UTC