- From: JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:42:59 +0000
- To: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, Tracking Protection Working Group WG <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <DB4282D9ADFE2A4EA9D1C0FB54BC3BD76E4D0636@TK5EX14MBXC139.redmond.corp.microsoft.>
Shane, I'm not sure I understand what you have listed. If a user opts-out of OBA for ads.com and has a site specific exception for ads.com then the user can receive targeted ads? What if the user is sending DNT:0 and has opted-out? Can a user provide a general exemption for OBA? Thanks, JC Twitter<http://twitter.com/jccannon7> From: Shane Wiley [mailto:wileys@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 8:55 PM To: Tracking Protection Working Group WG Subject: ACTION-52: Propose specific text for ISSUE-35, ISSUE-52, ISSUE-53, ISSUE-57, ISSUE-58 Description: Propose specific text for ISSUE-35, ISSUE-52, ISSUE-53, ISSUE-57, ISSUE-58 <extracted from Yahoo's "W3C Proposal - DAA DNT Hybrid" document presented at Princeton> Honoring User Preferences As multiple systems may be setting, sending, and receiving DNT and/or Opt-Out signals at the same time, it'll be important to ensure industry and web browser vendors are on the same page with respect to honoring user choices in circumstances where "mixed signals" may be received. o No DNT Signal / No Opt-Out: Browser / device is not opted-out o DNT Signal / No Opt-Out: Browser/device is opted-out o Opt-Out / No DNT Signal: Browser/device is opted-out o Opt-Out / DNT Exception: Exception is honored (browser/device is not opted-out) NOTE: The above text will need to be modified to include the appropriate terminology as this is decided upon by the working group. For example, DNT Exception would need to be replaced with "Site-Specific Exception/Exemption" depending on the outcome of that discussion.
Received on Sunday, 12 February 2012 22:44:17 UTC