- From: Tom Lowenthal <tom@mozilla.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:53:20 -0800
- To: Bryan Sullivan <blsaws@gmail.com>
- CC: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>, JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4F288D00.5040609@mozilla.com>
ISSUE-36 Action-63 Proposed text: "This standard provides general requirements on data collection, use, and disclosure. These requirements are not specific to behavioral advertising." On 01/26/2012 07:29 PM, Bryan Sullivan wrote: > I agree, either a direct statement such as suggested or > > "This standard does not single out any particular use of data for special > treatment under DNT, other than the cases of specific exemption." > > > But I like Shane's wording better. > > On 1/26/12 6:59 AM, "Shane Wiley" <wileys@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > >> Then I would suggest state just that then: >> >> "The standard does not single out behavioral advertising for special >> treatment." >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jonathan Mayer [mailto:jmayer@stanford.edu] >> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 3:54 PM >> To: JC Cannon >> Cc: Shane Wiley; public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org) >> Subject: Re: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of >> personalization (ISSUE-36) >> >> This text is not intended to prohibit or allow anything. It only >> clarifies that the standard does not single out behavioral advertising >> for any special treatment. >> >> On Jan 26, 2012, at 3:44 PM, JC Cannon wrote: >> >>> I agree with Shane. Personalization based on demographics or >>> organizational membership could also be permitted. >>> >>> JC >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Shane Wiley [mailto:wileys@yahoo-inc.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 6:27 AM >>> To: Jonathan Mayer >>> Cc: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org) >>> Subject: RE: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms >>> of personalization (ISSUE-36) >>> >>> I disagree with a general prohibition on any personalization based on >>> DNT which the current text would suggest. For example, geo-location or >>> context. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Jonathan Mayer [mailto:jmayer@stanford.edu] >>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 3:24 PM >>> To: Shane Wiley >>> Cc: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org) >>> Subject: Re: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms >>> of personalization (ISSUE-36) >>> >>> We haven't defined tracking in the document, and I see no reason to add >>> a dependency here. >>> >>> On Jan 26, 2012, at 3:21 PM, Shane Wiley wrote: >>> >>>> Friendly amendment: >>>> >>>> "This standard does not differentiate between personalization for >>>> advertisement targeting and other uses of personalization based on >>>> tracking." >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Jonathan Mayer [mailto:jmayer@stanford.edu] >>>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 3:13 PM >>>> To: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org) >>>> Subject: Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of >>>> personalization (ISSUE-36) >>>> >>>> Proposed text: >>>> >>>> "This standard does not differentiate between personalization for >>>> advertisement targeting and other uses of personalization." >>>> >>>> And making this issue CLOSED. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 00:54:54 UTC