W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > February 2012

Re: ACTION-52: Propose specific text for ISSUE-35, ISSUE-52, ISSUE-53, ISSUE-57, ISSUE-58

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 00:21:52 +0100
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Cc: "Aleecia M. McDonald" <aleecia@aleecia.com>
Message-ID: <3393890.2V5jxYJaxY@hegel.sophia.w3.org>
This is important for the non-US context where it may be useful to know that 
the user hasn't expressed a will yet and this may be the occasion to trigger a 
"opt-back-in" scenario to get some statement of will

So No-DNT-header = DNT:0 may be a reality for the US because of out-of-band-
of-the-specification-regulations, but it is not the only landscape we are 
operating in and we shouldn't set the implication of one particular landscape 
as an absolute in the Specification. 

Thanks Aleecia for spotting that. 


On Thursday 16 February 2012 10:40:25 Aleecia M. McDonald wrote:
> While I think I did reflect the call (thanks for confirming, Shane) an
> off-list question points out that there is a problem with this. I think
> what we wanted was
>                 • No DNT Signal / No Opt-Out:  Treat as no DNT signal
> rather than "Treat as DNT:0"
> Does this seem right?
Received on Saturday, 18 February 2012 23:22:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:38:34 UTC