- From: Kevin Trilli <ktrilli@truste.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:05:22 -0800
- To: Matthias Schunter <mts@zurich.ibm.com>
- CC: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 17:05:53 UTC
Matthias: I had put some similar thoughts into this response to the revised response header thread in case it got buried: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Feb/0193.html Kevin On Feb 24, 2012, at 3:15 AM, Matthias Schunter wrote: Hi Folks, I created a table in the W3C Wiki to start comparing both approaches: http://www.w3.org/wiki/DntResponseHeaderOrURI Feel free to correct, augment, improve my initial (likely to be subjective) assessment. Regards, matthias On 2/23/2012 8:04 PM, Matthias Schunter wrote: Hi Team, in order to differentiate the advantages and disadvantages of our two feedback mechanisms: - Feedback via well-known URI - Feedback via response header We decided to collect use cases to 'benchmark' both solutions. Please respond to this note with your proposed use cases. I will then summarize them. Reagards, matthias
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 17:05:53 UTC