- From: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:35:13 -0500
- To: JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Vincent Toubiana <v.toubiana@free.fr>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Le 2 févr. 2012 à 19:44, JC Cannon a écrit : > Are you indicating that 3rd parties must go back through raw logs or processed data to erase the referrer de-identify the entry? If the former this will near impossible for companies who collect an enormous amount of logs daily. This is a reasonable argument, but then the other solution would be to opacify the data on the spot and/or not record them at all. Which one is the most reasonable? Shutting down options without proposing new ones doesn't help the discussion. >> - A User-Agent sending DNT:1 MAY prevent the transmission of cookies and other identifiers that are sent with the request. > If cookie suppression occurs at the client it will override exceptions that may be place for a site. exceptions of which nature? opt-in cookies and/or opt-out cookies. It might be interesting to develop a solution where this is manageable by sites. STill need to think about that. -- Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/ Developer Relations, Opera Software
Received on Friday, 10 February 2012 20:35:49 UTC