- From: Kevin Smith <kevsmith@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:53:50 -0800
- To: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, Tracking Protection Working Group WG <public-tracking@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 18:54:27 UTC
Shane, Can you provide examples of how a publisher might act differently if they get a null vs no header at all? From: Shane Wiley [mailto:wileys@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 10:09 PM To: Tracking Protection Working Group WG Subject: ACTION-84: Wiley to describe the reason for setting DNT=null Description: Wiley to describe the reason for setting DNT=null Draft: <non-normative> As many User Agents may fall outside of the large web browser vendors, such as Apps, Toolbars, Custom Web Kits, etc., it will be helpful for publishers to receive a signal that a User Agent supports DNT even when a user has not yet provided a preference. <normative> User Agents SHOULD provide a null DNT signal if the user has not yet provided a preference and the User Agent supports DNT.
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 18:54:27 UTC