W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Issue-107, Issue-120, Issue-124

From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:18:18 -0800
Message-Id: <0BFC675E-BB21-491E-B222-3C217BDD57D1@consumerwatchdog.org>
Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
I thought earlier versions of the TPE made it clear that their were two options under consideration.  I didn't get that impression from this latest version

On Feb 27, 2012, at 4:13 PM, David Singer wrote:

> On Feb 27, 2012, at 16:11 , John Simpson wrote:
>> Hi Roy and David,
>> I was just reading the latest version of the TPE standard dated today, Feb. 27.  As I now read and understand it you've got a response from a well-known URI as a *must* and an HTTP response header as a *may*.
>> Am I reading this right?  I thought we were still trying to decide which is the better method. Have I missed something on the email list?
> I think they are both in the spec. while we determine what outcome the group wants.  Which one(s) remain, under what mandate or option, is indeed for the group to decide.
> I think the author of the response header indicated he might be OK with a 'may', which might be why it's written that way now.
> David Singer
> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.

John M. Simpson
Consumer Advocate
Consumer Watchdog
1750 Ocean Park Blvd. ,Suite 200
Santa Monica, CA,90405
Tel: 310-392-7041
Cell: 310-292-1902
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 00:18:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:45 UTC