John I'm not sure if Chris is a member of the group or not.
Maybe you missed it in the flurry of emails going by, but I specifically
commended Nick and Aleecia for agreeing to reach out and bring more
publishers in as I think its a great idea.
Cheers,
Alan Chapell
Chapell & Associates
917 318 8440
From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:33:50 -0800
To: Lauren Gelman <gelman@blurryedge.com>
Cc: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>, Jeffrey Chester
<jeff@democraticmedia.org>, Lee Tien <tien@eff.org>, "Amy Colando (LCA)"
<acolando@microsoft.com>, Kathy Joe <K.Joe@esomar.org>, Jules Polonetsky
<julespol@futureofprivacy.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org"
<public-tracking@w3.org>, "adam.phillips@realresearch.co.uk"
<adam.phillips@realresearch.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34
Resent-From: <public-tracking@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:34:15 +0000
Alan,
Isn't Chris Pedigo of the Online Publishers Association a member of the
group?
Hasn't the Nick Doty, of the W3C, explicitly suggested ways for more
publisher involvement and offered to reach out bring more publishers in?
John
On Feb 13, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Lauren Gelman wrote:
>> Moreover, can you provide some evidence to back up the claim that it is a
>> reasonable expectation for publishers to have a group with almost zero direct
>> input from the publisher community dictate the terms of their interactions
>> with their visitors?
----------
John M. Simpson
Consumer Advocate
Consumer Watchdog
1750 Ocean Park Blvd. ,Suite 200
Santa Monica, CA,90405
Tel: 310-392-7041
Cell: 310-292-1902
www.ConsumerWatchdog.org <http://www.ConsumerWatchdog.org>
john@consumerwatchdog.org