public-tracking@w3.org from October 2011 by author

Aleecia M. McDonald

• Fwd: TPAC updates (name tags, t-shirts, lunch BOF tables) (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (Sunday, 30 October)
• Re: Straw poll: dinner Monday 31 October (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Does DNT apply only to 3rd parties, and cross-site tracking? (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: Does DNT apply only to 3rd parties, and cross-site tracking? (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Straw poll: dinner Monday 31 October (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Issue-4 (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Summary of compliance issues raised (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93 (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Strawman documents, Santa Clara agenda, and the FPWD (Monday, 24 October)
• Fwd: Daylight Savings Time change (Monday, 24 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] (Friday, 21 October)
• Agenda: Tracking Protection WG Meeting 2011-10-31 & 11-01 (Thursday, 20 October)
• Next steps (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Summary of progress on Issue 59 (Wednesday, 19 October)
• agenda for wednesday call (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Wednesday, 12 October)
• Registration for Santa Clara (Thursday, 6 October)
• first parties (Thursday, 6 October)
• From Shane (Wednesday, 5 October)
• Re: Proposed language for first-party websites (Tuesday, 4 October)
• Agenda for 2011-10-04 TPWG call (Tuesday, 4 October)

Amy Colando (LCA)

• RE: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (Sunday, 30 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Friday, 28 October)
• RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Wednesday, 26 October)
• RE: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93 (Wednesday, 26 October)
• RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Friday, 21 October)
• RE: Proposed First Party definition (Saturday, 15 October)
• Proposed First Party definition (Friday, 14 October)
• RE: ISSUE-89: Does DNT mean at a high level: (a) no customization, users are seen for the first time, every time. (b) DNT is about data moving between sites. (Wednesday, 12 October)
• RE: first parties (Monday, 10 October)
• RE: first parties (Thursday, 6 October)

Ashkan Soltani

• Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1 (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1 (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1 (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1 (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (Sunday, 30 October)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Draft Language on Interaction with Third-Party Content (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: DNT and search revenues (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Comments on tracking-compliance.html (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure (Tuesday, 25 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Thursday, 20 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Thursday, 20 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (Sunday, 16 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• Re: Action 13 - Mandatory Server Response (Wednesday, 12 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (Wednesday, 12 October)
• Re: ISSUE-89: Does DNT mean at a high level: (a) no customization, users are seen for the first time, every time. (b) DNT is about data moving between sites. (Saturday, 8 October)
• Re: ISSUE-89: Does DNT mean at a high level: (a) no customization, users are seen for the first time, every time. (b) DNT is about data moving between sites. (Wednesday, 5 October)
• Re: From Shane (Wednesday, 5 October)

Brett Error

• RE: DISCUSSION: Selective Opt-in (chapter 5 of editors draft) [ISSUE-42, ISSUE-27, ISSUE-46] (Monday, 17 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• RE: first parties (Monday, 10 October)
• RE: first parties (Friday, 7 October)

Carmen Balber

• Does DNT apply only to 3rd parties, and cross-site tracking? (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93 (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] (Thursday, 20 October)

Clay Webster

• Re: Proposed First Party definition (Monday, 24 October)
• Re: first parties (Friday, 7 October)

David Singer

• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: Issue-4 (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Draft Language on Interaction with Third-Party Content (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Issue-4 (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Issue-4 (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Issue-4 (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: Draft Language on Interaction with Third-Party Content (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Saturday, 22 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Friday, 21 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Friday, 21 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Thursday, 20 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 20 October)
• Re: ISSUE-92: If data collection (even very specific with IP address, user agent, referrer) is time-limited, with very limited retention, is that still tracking? (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Regrets (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Tuesday, 18 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Tuesday, 18 October)

David Wainberg

• Re: Draft Language on Interaction with Third-Party Content (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Draft Language on Interaction with Third-Party Content (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Proposed definition of 1st parties (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93 (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93 (Tuesday, 25 October)
• Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure (Tuesday, 25 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Tuesday, 25 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Tuesday, 25 October)
• RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Friday, 21 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• Re: Action 13 - Mandatory Server Response (Tuesday, 11 October)
• Re: first parties (Friday, 7 October)

Heather West

• Frozen Compliance doc (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: Strawman documents, Santa Clara agenda, and the FPWD (Tuesday, 25 October)
• Re: Strawman documents, Santa Clara agenda, and the FPWD (Tuesday, 25 October)

JC Cannon

• RE: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure (Wednesday, 26 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Tuesday, 25 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Sunday, 23 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Saturday, 22 October)
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] (Wednesday, 19 October)
• RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Tuesday, 18 October)
• RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Saturday, 15 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (Tuesday, 11 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (Tuesday, 11 October)

Jeffrey Chester

• Re: Proposed definition of 1st parties (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Proposed definition of 1st parties (Wednesday, 26 October)

Jennifer Karan

• RE: Comments on tracking-compliance.html (Wednesday, 26 October)
• RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (Sunday, 16 October)

John Simpson

• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Friday, 28 October)
• Issue 5 and First and Third parties (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: Issue-4 (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93 (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93 (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure (Wednesday, 26 October)

Jonathan Mayer

• Re: ISSUE-84: Do we need a JavaScript API / DOM property for client-side js access to Do Not Track status? (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: Summary of Options for 1P Learning of 3P DNT Status (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (Monday, 31 October)
• Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: Summary of Options for 1P Learning of 3P DNT Status (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: Issue-4 (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Draft Language on Interaction with Third-Party Content (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Summary of Options for 1P Learning of 3P DNT Status (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93 (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Tuesday, 25 October)
• Web Tracking: Facts on the Ground (Thursday, 20 October)
• Re: Proposed First Party definition (Sunday, 16 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• Proposed language for first-party websites (Tuesday, 4 October)
• Proposed language for third-party outsourcing (Tuesday, 4 October)

Jonathan Robert Mayer

• Re: Action 13 - Mandatory Server Response (Monday, 10 October)

Jules Polonetsky

• RE: TPE Document, S2.3 P1 (Monday, 31 October)
• RE: TPE Document, S2.3 P1 (Monday, 31 October)
• RE: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93 (Wednesday, 26 October)
• RE: Web Tracking: Facts on the Ground (Sunday, 23 October)

Justin Brookman

• Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Strawman compliance spec (Tuesday, 25 October)
• Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure (Tuesday, 25 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• Re: first parties (Friday, 7 October)
• Re: first parties (Thursday, 6 October)

Karl Dubost

• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Issue-4 (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Summary of Options for 1P Learning of 3P DNT Status (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: DNT and search revenues (Thursday, 27 October)
• DNT and search revenues (Thursday, 27 October)
• building consensus (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93 (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93 (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Tuesday, 25 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Friday, 21 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Friday, 21 October)
• Re: ISSUE-92: If data collection (even very specific with IP address, user agent, referrer) is time-limited, with very limited retention, is that still tracking? (Friday, 21 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (Friday, 21 October)
• Re: DISCUSSION: Selective Opt-in (chapter 5 of editors draft) [ISSUE-42, ISSUE-27, ISSUE-46] (Friday, 21 October)
• Re: Proposed First Party definition (Friday, 21 October)
• Re: Call for Experts: How can a site determine whether it is 1st or 3rd party? [ISSUE-60] (Friday, 21 October)
• Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (Friday, 21 October)
• Re: Can we close ISSUE-42? I believe it to be largely superseded by ISSUE-43 (Friday, 21 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (Friday, 21 October)

Kevin Smith

• RE: ISSUE-92: If data collection (even very specific with IP address, user agent, referrer) is time-limited, with very limited retention, is that still tracking? (Wednesday, 19 October)
• RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Tuesday, 18 October)
• RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (Sunday, 16 October)
• RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (Sunday, 16 October)
• RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (Sunday, 16 October)
• RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Sunday, 16 October)
• [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Friday, 14 October)
• [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (Friday, 14 October)
• RE: Call for Experts: How can a site determine whether it is 1st or 3rd party? (Thursday, 13 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• RE: Action 13 - Mandatory Server Response (Wednesday, 12 October)

Kevin Trilli

• Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (Monday, 17 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (Wednesday, 12 October)

Kimon Zorbas

• RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Friday, 14 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Friday, 14 October)

Lee Tien

• Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (Wednesday, 12 October)
• Re: first parties (Sunday, 9 October)

Matthias Schunter

• Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: Does DNT apply only to 3rd parties, and cross-site tracking? (Thursday, 27 October)
• Fwd: Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Proposed definition of 1st parties (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Proposed definition of 1st parties (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Input for TPE Discussion: Issue cleanup (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Proposed First Party definition (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (Wednesday, 26 October)
• No DNT Call on 2011-11-02 (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Agenda for Wednesday 2011-10-26 DNT Team Call (Tuesday, 25 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] (Friday, 21 October)
• RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: Proposed First Party definition (Saturday, 15 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (Saturday, 15 October)
• Re: Call for Experts: How can a site determine whether it is 1st or 3rd party? [ISSUE-60] (Friday, 14 October)
• Re: Call for Experts: How can a site determine whether it is 1st or 3rd party? [ISSUE-60] (Thursday, 13 October)
• Call for Experts: How can a site determine whether it is 1st or 3rd party? (Thursday, 13 October)
• Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (Wednesday, 12 October)
• DISCUSSION: Selective Opt-in (chapter 5 of editors draft) [ISSUE-42, ISSUE-27, ISSUE-46] (Wednesday, 12 October)
• Can we close ISSUE-42? I believe it to be largely superseded by ISSUE-43 (Wednesday, 12 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (Wednesday, 12 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (Tuesday, 11 October)
• Agenda for 2011-10-12 DNT Workgroup Meeting (Tuesday, 11 October)
• Re: first parties (Sunday, 9 October)
• Re: first parties (Friday, 7 October)
• Response Headers [ISSUE-47,ISSUE-48,ISSUE-51,ISSUE-76,ISSUE-79,ISSUE-80,ISSUE-81,ISSUE-87] (Tuesday, 4 October)
• Definitions: 1st vs 3rd Party [ISSUE-10,ISSUE-14] (Tuesday, 4 October)

Mike Zaneis

• Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (Sunday, 30 October)
• RE: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93 (Wednesday, 26 October)
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] (Friday, 21 October)
• RE: Web Tracking: Facts on the Ground (Thursday, 20 October)
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] (Thursday, 20 October)
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] (Wednesday, 19 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• RE: first parties (Friday, 7 October)
• Re: Proposed language for first-party websites (Wednesday, 5 October)

Nicholas Doty

• Call-in for Tracking Protection second face-to-face (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Saturday, 29 October)
• Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93 (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: agenda for wednesday call (Sunday, 23 October)
• Participation and f2f registration (Monday, 17 October)
• Re: Agenda for 2011-10-12 DNT Workgroup Meeting (Friday, 14 October)
• Fwd: Hotel Update--Re: W3C Meeting: TPAC2011 - please register and book hotel (Monday, 10 October)
• Re: Agenda for 2011-10-05 TPWG call (Monday, 10 October)
• Working Group calendar (Tuesday, 4 October)

Nick Doty

• Re: Proposed First Party definition (Friday, 14 October)

Ninja Marnau

• Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Agenda for 2011-10-12 DNT Workgroup Meeting (Tuesday, 11 October)

Peter Eckersley

• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)

Rigo Wenning

• Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Draft Language on Interaction with Third-Party Content (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Issue-4 (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Issue-4 (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (Wednesday, 26 October)
• Re: Summary of compliance issues raised (Wednesday, 26 October)

Ronan Heffernan

• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (Thursday, 27 October)

Roy T. Fielding

• exclude comma from DNT extension syntax (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1 (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1 (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1 (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1 (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: Summary of Options for 1P Learning of 3P DNT Status (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: Summary of Options for 1P Learning of 3P DNT Status (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Sunday, 30 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Issue-4 (Friday, 28 October)
• frozen version of TPE spec for Santa Clara meeting (Friday, 28 October)
• Re: Issue-4 (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: Comments on tracking-compliance.html (Wednesday, 26 October)
• current state of tracking preference expression spec (Tuesday, 25 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Friday, 21 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Friday, 21 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Wednesday, 12 October)
• editor's draft for Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) (Wednesday, 12 October)
• Re: Action 13 - Mandatory Server Response (Tuesday, 11 October)
• Re: Action 13 - Mandatory Server Response (Monday, 10 October)
• Re: ISSUE-89: Does DNT mean at a high level: (a) no customization, users are seen for the first time, every time. (b) DNT is about data moving between sites. (Saturday, 8 October)
• Re: ISSUE-89: Does DNT mean at a high level: (a) no customization, users are seen for the first time, every time. (b) DNT is about data moving between sites. (Thursday, 6 October)
• Re: Action 8 - Proposal for a DNT definition for 3rd Parties (Wednesday, 5 October)

Sean Harvey

• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: Issue-4 (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Monday, 24 October)

Shane Wiley

• ISSUE 17: Data use by 1st Party (Monday, 31 October)
• RE: TPE Document, S2.3 P1 (Monday, 31 October)
• RE: Proposed definition of 1st parties (Friday, 28 October)
• RE: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (Thursday, 27 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 27 October)
• RE: Proposed definition of 1st parties (Wednesday, 26 October)
• RE: Proposed definition of 1st parties (Wednesday, 26 October)
• RE: Proposed First Party definition (Wednesday, 26 October)
• RE: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure (Wednesday, 26 October)
• RE: Propose to drop from the strawman: requirement for privacy policy disclosure (Wednesday, 26 October)
• RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Tuesday, 18 October)
• RE: DISCUSSION: Selective Opt-in (chapter 5 of editors draft) [ISSUE-42, ISSUE-27, ISSUE-46] (Sunday, 16 October)
• RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Sunday, 16 October)
• RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (Sunday, 16 October)
• RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (Sunday, 16 October)
• RE: Proposed First Party definition (Sunday, 16 October)
• RE: ISSUE-89: Does DNT mean at a high level: (a) no customization, users are seen for the first time, every time. (b) DNT is about data moving between sites. (Wednesday, 12 October)
• RE: first parties (Friday, 7 October)
• RE: first parties (Friday, 7 October)
• RE: first parties (Friday, 7 October)
• RE: first parties (Thursday, 6 October)
• RE: Proposed language for first-party websites (Thursday, 6 October)
• RE: ISSUE-89: Does DNT mean at a high level: (a) no customization, users are seen for the first time, every time. (b) DNT is about data moving between sites. (Thursday, 6 October)
• RE: From Shane (Thursday, 6 October)

Thomas Roessler

• FYI: TPAC discount registration extended through Friday, 21 October (Tuesday, 11 October)

Tom Lowenthal

• Re: Issue-4 (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1 (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1 (Monday, 31 October)
• TPE Document S3 (Monday, 31 October)
• TPE Document, S2.3 P1 (Monday, 31 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: Summary of compliance issues raised (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: DNT and search revenues (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: Issue-4 (Thursday, 27 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 20 October)
• Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (Thursday, 20 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] (Wednesday, 19 October)
• Re: ISSUE-89: Does DNT mean at a high level: (a) no customization, users are seen for the first time, every time. (b) DNT is about data moving between sites. (Tuesday, 11 October)
• Action 13 - Mandatory Server Response (Monday, 10 October)
• Re: Fwd: Action 9 - Proposal for a DNT definition for 1st Parties (Wednesday, 5 October)
• Re: Action 8 - Proposal for a DNT definition for 3rd Parties (Wednesday, 5 October)
• Fwd: Action 9 - Proposal for a DNT definition for 1st Parties (Tuesday, 4 October)
• Action 8 - Proposal for a DNT definition for 3rd Parties (Tuesday, 4 October)

Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-97: Re-direction, shortened URLs, click analytics -- what kind of tracking is this? (Monday, 31 October)
• ISSUE-96: The doNotTrack attribute should mirror the value of the header (potentially empty, extensions, etc.) (Monday, 31 October)
• ISSUE-95: May an institution or network provider set a tracking preference for a user? (Monday, 31 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-94: Is "Do Not Track" the right name to use? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] (Monday, 24 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] (Wednesday, 19 October)
• ISSUE-92: If data collection (even very specific with IP address, user agent, referrer) is time-limited, with very limited retention, is that still tracking? (Wednesday, 19 October)
• ISSUE-91: Might want prohibitions on first parties re-selling data to get around the intent of DNT (Wednesday, 12 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-90 (caching): Interaction of DNT with caching and intermediaries [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Tuesday, 11 October)
• ISSUE-89: Does DNT mean at a high level: (a) no customization, users are seen for the first time, every time. (b) DNT is about data moving between sites. (Wednesday, 5 October)

Vincent Toubiana

• Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (Thursday, 13 October)

イアンフェッティ

• Re: Summary of Options for 1P Learning of 3P DNT Status (Monday, 31 October)

Last message date: Monday, 31 October 2011 23:50:26 UTC