W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2011

RE: Proposed language for first-party websites

From: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:27:02 -0700
To: Mike Zaneis <mike@iab.net>, "Aleecia M. McDonald" <aleecia@aleecia.com>
CC: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <63294A1959410048A33AEE161379C8023D01C95270@SP2-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com>
Agreed - and it felt everyone on the call yesterday also agreed.  Is it possible to consider this particular question decided and leave it to anyone who disagrees to come forward?

Thank you,

Shane Wiley
VP, Privacy & Data Governance

-----Original Message-----
From: public-tracking-request@w3.org [mailto:public-tracking-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mike Zaneis
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 8:20 AM
To: Aleecia M. McDonald
Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
Subject: Re: Proposed language for first-party websites

We would support the first party exemption from DNT. 

Mike Zaneis
SVP & General Counsel, IAB
(202) 253-1466

On Oct 4, 2011, at 5:48 PM, "Aleecia M. McDonald" <aleecia@aleecia.com> wrote:

> Thanks to Jonathan for getting through his open actions and kicking off discussion.
> Quiet as mice... What do you all say to his proposed language for third- and first-party websites? Should I take silence as unanimous agreement? 
>    Aleecia
> On Oct 3, 2011, at 7:41 PM, Jonathan Mayer wrote:
>> (ACTION-11, ISSUE-17, and ISSUE-51)
>> First-Party Requirements:
>> This standard imposes no requirements on first-party websites.  A first-party website MAY take steps to protect user privacy in responding to a Do Not Track request.
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 19:29:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:38:25 UTC