W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Agenda for 2011-10-12 DNT Workgroup Meeting

From: Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:09:23 -0700
Cc: Matthias Schunter <mts@zurich.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <36CD4E5E-FC48-4CBE-B8AC-65B6A1E5B466@w3.org>
To: Tracking Protection Working Group WG <public-tracking@w3.org>
Cleaned up minutes are available: http://www.w3.org/2011/10/12-dnt-minutes

A quick logistical note: it would be nice to keep track of attendance on these calls. If you're on IRC and the phone, you can inform Zakim which number is yours ("Zakim, aazz is npdoty"). If you're not on IRC, it would be great if you could introduce yourself with your country code and area code so that we know who's on the call. And if you see your phone number in the Present section on the minutes, let me know and I can replace it with your name/username.

Thanks,
Nick

On Oct 11, 2011, at 5:50 AM, Matthias Schunter wrote:

> Hi Team,
> 
> enclosed is the agenda for tomorrow's call.
> 
> After a summary of the ongoing discussions on 1st parties and their
> behavior under DNT, we will focus on the DNT protocol (Roy Fielding
> being the corresponding editor) with a particular focus on the
> response message.
> 
> Feel free to post response proposals on the mailing list and/or
> discuss existing proposals.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> matthias
> 
> ================ Infrastructure =================
> 
> Zakim teleconference bridge:
> VoIP:    sip:zakim@voip.w3.org
> Phone +1617761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225)
> IRC Chat:
> IRC: irc.w3.org, port 6665, #dnt
> 
> ================ Agenda for 2011-10-12 WG Call =================
> 
> Details: See calendar at
> https://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=is1g67kems9ijeroa7ud7dhhg4%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America/Los_Angeles
> 
> ------------
> Administrative
> ------------
> 
> 1. Selection of scribe
> 
> 2. Any comments on minutes from the last call:
> http://www.w3.org/2011/10/04-dnt-minutes.html
> 
> 3. Announcement: Division of Work between the Chairs:
> 
> 
> ------------
> Old business
> ------------
> 
> 4.  Review of action items:
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/
> 
> 5. Summary of discussions on 1st and 3rd parties addition to
> strawman-proposals
> 
> 
> ---------------------------
> New business: Tracking Preferences Expression
> 
> Chair:  Matthias Schunter
> Editor: Roy Fielding
> ---------------------------
> 
> ---------------------------
> 6. Response Headers
> 
> 
>  A) ISSUES
> 	ISSUE-81	Do we need a response at all from server?
> 	ISSUE-51	Should 1st party have any response to DNT signal
> 	ISSUE-79	Should a server respond if a user sent DNT:0?
> 	ISSUE-76	Should a server echo the DNT header to confirm receipt?
> 	ISSUE-48	Response from the server could both acknowledge receipt of a
> value and (separately) whether the server will honor it
> 	ISSUE-87	Should there be an option for the server to respond with "I
> don't know what my policy is"
> 	ISSUE-47	Should the response from the server point to a URI of a
> policy (or an existing protocol) rather than a single bit in the protocol?
> 	ISSUE-80	Instead of responding with a Link: header URI, does it make
> sense to use a well-known location for this policy?
> 
>  B) Presentation of Proposals on the table
> 
> 
>  C) Discussion
> 
>  D) Steps towards a strawman
>    - Homework/Actions
> 	- Tasks for the editor
> 
> 
> ---------------------------
> 9. Announce next meeting & Adjourn
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 14 October 2011 03:09:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:41 UTC