W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2011

RE: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]

From: JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:45:03 +0000
To: Tracking Protection Working Group WG <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DB4282D9ADFE2A4EA9D1C0FB54BC3BD768167FDA@TK5EX14MBXC135.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Companies already charge customers because they cannot make enough money from advertising or other sources. Why would this be any different?

JC

-----Original Message-----
From: public-tracking-request@w3.org [mailto:public-tracking-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 12:05 PM
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Subject: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]


tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]

http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/93


Raised by: Aleecia McDonald
On product: Tracking Definitions and Compliance

[Note: raised by Carmen, who is working through W3C paperwork]

We would be leery of first parties being able to penalize consumers (for example, with a pay wall, blocking content entirely, or perhaps by other means) because consumers implemented Do Not Track.




Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 19:45:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:41 UTC