- From: Heather West <heatherwest@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:25:36 -0400
- To: "Aleecia M. McDonald" <aleecia@aleecia.com>
- Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CA+Z3oOZi6-wFDbb4ME3cU7cHpndHOuuDv8R_Y6BiOR_DW1HJTQ@mail.gmail.com>
The Tracking Compliance draft is now posted here: http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html Hopefully it will provide a useful frame. We know that it's a little scattered, but moving forward it'll only get better! Thanks! Heather (and Justin, Sean, and Erica) On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Aleecia M. McDonald <aleecia@aleecia.com>wrote: > Greetings, > > I want to make sure everyone is clear on the very busy week and a half we > are all about to have. This is one of those times that will emphasize the > "working" part of Working Group. > > - Tonight, editors will send copies of their strawman documents for > the Tracking Compliance and Tracking Preference Expression deliverables. > Please read these. They are starting points for discussion, and will give > you a good sense of the structure for the documents and the decisions we > have ahead of us. > - Wednesday call, chaired by Matthias, we will discuss these > documents and start to go through any issues you have. > - On the mailing list, please also raise anything that you are not > comfortable with. Note that in many places there are just bare issues > listed. It does not mean that we will accept the premise of the issue, it > means that it is something we will discuss and resolve (so "should we think > about XYZ?" could be resolved as "No, we should not.") In some places in the > strawman documents there are multiple options to consider. We do not need to > resolve those issues, just calling out ways we might do so. Basically: are > we all addressing the right things in a sensible structure? > - The editors will make changes to the strawman drafts based on your > feedback, up to Thursday at 10:30 am pacific / 1:30 pm eastern -- so, 24 > hours after the group call on Wednesday. The editors will have changes done > by Friday morning so people can discuss with colleagues and also carefully > read documents on their flights to Santa Clara. > - Feel free to continue the discussion on the mailing list. We will > continue in person in Santa Clara, so talking things out on the mailing list > is useful even though the strawman document will be frozen. > > To repeat what is in the agenda and what we have discussed on calls, and > make sure this is also very clear: > - Monday 31 October in Santa Clara, we jump right into reviewing the > two strawman documents, back-to-back. Our goal: find and fix any sections > that are blocking us from releasing these documents as our First Public > Working Drafts. To be clear, the FPWDs will be early drafts, as the name > implies. This will be our first group publication of where we are starting. > We may receive outside feedback on these documents. We will continue to add > new issues to the list we have captured now, but the FPWD is a snapshot of > where we are starting. > - The rest of Monday we will spend working through additional issues > that seem best discussed in person for the Tracking Compliance document. > Based on discussions around the strawman documents and past discussions, I > will go through the raised issues against the Tracking Compliance document > and change status to "open" for those I think are the best candidates to > work through in Santa Clara by the end of this week. Matthias will manage > "open" status for the Tracking Preference Expression document. > - Tuesday we will return to discussion of our third possible > deliverable, Tracking Selection Lists (TPLs,) with the goal of reaching a > decision on how to proceed. As everyone who was at this session in Boston no > doubt recalls, this was a hot topic with some in favor of standardizing > Tracking Selections Lists and some thinking it is not something W3C should > take on. Particularly if you are new, you may want to discuss this > internally and review the minutes from the last session of the Boston > meeting prior to coming to Santa Clara, in order to be fully prepared for > the group discussion. > - The rest of Tuesday we will discuss additional issues that seem > best discussed in person for the Tracking Preference Expression document. > > We will have some minor timing changes to the agenda, based on which time > slot we get for lunch and details of when coffee will be set up for breaks. > The basics of what is outlined above will not change (for example, the > Tracking Selection List discussion will be on Tuesday, it just may need to > move by half an hour, something along those lines.) We will post updates as > soon as we know all details. I am also working on a dinner reservation for > Monday night for an entirely optional self-hosted dinner; details to follow. > > I look forward to very productive series of discussions, and look forward > to seeing many of you a week from now in Santa Clara. > > Aleecia > -- Heather West | Google Policy | heatherwest@google.com | 202-643-6381
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:12:43 UTC