- From: Sean Harvey <sharvey@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:50:02 -0400
- To: Tracking Protection Working Group WG <public-tracking@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2011 14:50:31 UTC
Aleecia, I agree with Jonathan on this point. More information would be useful to the server. And I actually do disagree that opt in/out is currently out of scope. Our understanding coming in was that compliance with DNT might hinge on it being a vehicle for affirmative consent by the consumer, not a default setting from an ISP or in a browser. If the committee wants a broader scope we do need to discuss rather than immediately take it out of scope. We need to discuss further. That said, as others on the list have indicated, we do need to give the vendors scope to come up with creative, simple & useful ways to set the DNT header. i.e. as part of a sliding scale instead of a FE checkbox requirement. I'm sure as we hash it out we can come up with a way to provide flexibilty & creativity of usability/UI design while still ensuring that DNT represents affirmative consumer consent. I'm also confused by your statement that this is a political decision. Can you elaborate? Thanks! Sean
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2011 14:50:31 UTC