- From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:54:35 -0700
- To: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- Cc: David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
I cannot agree with this. ---------------- John M. Simpson Consumer Advocate Consumer Watchdog Tel: 310-392-7041 On Oct 25, 2011, at 7:14 PM, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> wrote: > > Le 25 oct. 2011 à 17:17, David Wainberg a écrit : >> ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT (It appears in 6.1 of the Compliance and Scope doc.) >> >> This is well out of scope of this standard, and should be dropped from the strawman document. The DNT standard should be limited to particular cases of data collection and use. It's not the role of the standard to require businesses to require or suggest broad changes to a company's business practices (such as giving away content and services for free) that aren't directly related to implementation of the standard and handling of the relevant data. > > > Seconded. > That said, it is useful non normative comment for implementers. > > -- > Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/ > Developer Relations & Tools, Opera Software > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:12:47 UTC