W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93

From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:54:35 -0700
Message-Id: <4F38008A-9AA9-4935-85AD-8CE7C85BBC97@consumerwatchdog.org>
Cc: David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
To: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
I cannot agree with this.

----------------
John M. Simpson
Consumer Advocate
Consumer Watchdog
Tel: 310-392-7041
 

On Oct 25, 2011, at 7:14 PM, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> wrote:

> 
> Le 25 oct. 2011 à 17:17, David Wainberg a écrit :
>> ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT (It appears in 6.1 of the Compliance and Scope doc.)
>> 
>> This is well out of scope of this standard, and should be dropped from the strawman document. The DNT standard should be limited to particular cases of data collection and use. It's not the role of the standard to require businesses to require or suggest broad changes to a company's business practices (such as giving away content and services for free) that aren't directly related to implementation of the standard and handling of the relevant data.
> 
> 
> Seconded.
> That said, it is useful non normative comment for implementers.
> 
> -- 
> Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/
> Developer Relations & Tools, Opera Software
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:12:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:41 UTC